ISSN 0327-1471
printed version
ISSN 1668-8104
on-line version

Instructions to authors

• Scope and policy
• Form and preparation of manuscripts
• Sending of manuscripts

Section Policies

Original articles

They contain original research results that have not been previously published in any other form except preliminary (e.g., in a scientific event).

open shipping

Indexed

Peer evaluation

Special collaborations

They will be held at the invitation of the Responsible Editor with the agreement of the Editorial Committee and will be of the type of Conferences, Original Works or Updates.

open shipping

Indexed

Peer evaluation

Updates or revisions

In general they are ordered in the same way as the Original Works. The text will have a maximum length of 20 A4 size sheets and the bibliography must be exhaustive and current, according to the needs of each topic.

open shipping

Indexed

Peer evaluation

Letters to the Editor

They will refer to published articles or any other topic of interest, including suggestions and criticisms. They should not be longer than two (2) pages. Up to five (5) bibliographic citations may be included, they will be included at the discretion of the Responsible Editor and the Editorial Committee.

open shipping

Indexed

Peer evaluation

Presentation

open shipping

Indexed

Peer evaluation

Dossier "Bodies"

open shipping

Indexed

Peer evaluation

Peer evaluation process

Works in Spanish, English, Portuguese or French may be original research and updates or revisions of specific topics. Sections such as Editorials, Editor's Letters, Magazines of Magazines, International Collaborations, etc., will also be included at the discretion of the Responsible Editor and the Editorial Committee. Some original works, and in common agreement with the author, may be published with comments, criticisms and responses. All contributions received will be submitted to the arbitration process.

Reception of an article will be acknowledged within a maximum period of 15 days and the author will be informed of the status of the review within a maximum period of twelve months.

Contributions sent to Cuadernos FHyCS-UNJu that have passed the style and structure controls will be subjected to the review process of at least two specialists (double blind) that allows the anonymity of both the authors and the reviewers to be maintained. Therefore, each article will undergo two reviews and, if the recommendation does not coincide, it will be subject to a new review by a third evaluator within a period of no more than four weeks from its receipt.

Each article is evaluated by the reviewers based on a grid that includes: evaluation of the structure of the article, evaluation of the writing and evaluation of the content. Based on these criteria, the evaluators mark, as a conclusion, one of the following four options:

1 Accept for publication without modification
2 It can be published with the suggested modifications
3 It can be published with substantial suggested modifications
4 Reject the manuscript for the reasons stated.

The Editorial Team will be responsible for notifying the authors of the results of the evaluations that arose from the referees and the comments of the Assistant Editor. The modifications and corrections of the article must be made by the author within the period indicated by the Editorial Team of the Magazine.

Once the corrections are sent by the author(s), it is subjected to new evaluation by the Assistant Editor to examine whether the corrected article can be published or should be revised again. Once this process is completed, the article is submitted to the PRESS. At this stage, at the request of the Author, PROOF of WORK IN THE PRESS may be delivered and will be published in an issue according to the order of approval.

TYPES OF CONTRIBUTIONS

Original research works
It must present a significant advance regarding the degree of knowledge that one has of the topic it deals with.

Updates or Revisions of specific topics
In general they will be ordered in the same way as the original works. The text will have a maximum length of 20 A4 size pages and the bibliography must be exhaustive and current, according to the needs of each topic.

Letter to the Editor
They will refer to the published articles or any other topic of interest, including suggestions and criticisms. They should not be longer than two pages. Up to five bibliographic citations can be included.

Special Collaborations
They will be carried out at the invitation of the Responsible Editor with the agreement of the Editorial Committee and will be of the type of:
- Conferences
- Original or Updated Works

Original Article Evaluation Form

1. EVALUATION OF THE STRUCTURE

QUALIFICATION

1) Is it unambiguous and understandable for specialists in other fields?
2) Does it reflect the content of the article?
3) Is it specific?
4) Is it precise and not generic?
5) Does it contain the keywords or concepts related to them?

SUMMARY (for most readers this will be the main source of information about the study):

1) Briefly explain why the study was carried out (Background), what questions we wanted to answer (OBJECTIVES), how the study was carried out (MATERIALS AND METHODS), what was discovered (RESULTS) and the interpretation and consequences of the results. findings (CONCLUSIONS)?
2) Does it reflect the content of the article?
3) Does it contain the keywords or concepts related to them?
4) Is it informative?
5) Does all the information provided in the abstract also appear in the main body of the article?

KEYWORDS(They will allow the work to be found in a bibliographic review of the topic and for it to reach those interested in it)

1) Are they specific?
2) Do they reflect the content of the article and its topic?

INTRODUCTION(background and problem statement)

1) Is it explained why it was necessary to carry out the study?
2) Are the objectives of the research or the question(s) that were intended to be answered stated?
3) Does it rely on quotes?

1) Is it described in detail how the study was carried out? (for example: study area, data collection, inclusion and exclusion criteria, analysis categories, corpus analyzed, origin of the material analyzed, sources used, bibliography and authors used, sample size, number of measurements taken, age and sex of participants, equipment, data analysis, statistical tests and software used, etc.)?
2) Does it comply with bioethical standards? (informed consent, environmental protection, habeas data, etc.)

RESULTS

1) Are they presented in an orderly manner?
2) Do they respond to the research objectives?
3) Do you mention all the tables and figures that were used?
4) Do you repeat information from tables and figures?
5) Does it exclude important data?
6) Does it distort the data?
7) Is the statistical analysis and its interpretation adequate?

DISCUSSION

1) Does it respond to the questions or objectives of the research work? (formulated at the end of the Introduction)
2) Do you objectively compare the new results with already published data or background information on the topic?
3) Do you appeal to the bibliography to substantiate the results achieved?
4) Do you analyze the limitations of the research?
5) Does it highlight the main findings?
6) Is it orderly?

 CONCLUSIONS

1) Is it short and concise?
2) Does it emphasize the most significant conclusions?
3) Does it highlight the practical importance of the study?

 BIBLIOGRAPHY

1) Are all bibliographic references cited in the text?
2) Do the bibliographic references include all the data necessary for bibliographic retrieval in libraries or on the Internet? 3) Does the list of reference material include unpublished data? (The source of origin must be mentioned in the main body of the article)

2. EVALUATION OF THE WRITING

1) Is the text written concisely?
2) Is the text written clearly and legibly?
3) Are the different parts of the manuscript conveniently separated by subtitles?
4) Does it include information not pertinent to the research question(s) specified in the introduction?
5) Is the number of cited works excessive?
6) Is the bibliographic information used relevant and up-to-date?
7) Except for the summary, notes and conclusion paragraph, is the information provided in one of the sections repeated in the other sections?
8) Are all the included tables and figures necessary?
9) Are the data presented in the tables repeated in the figures (or vice versa)?
10) Are the legends at the bottom of tables and figures appropriate? (they should be informative but not too extensive)
11) Are the notes adequate? (they should be short and concise)
12) Are obvious sentences included?
13) Are the original data and ideas of the work clearly distinguished from those of other authors?
14) Are quotation marks and references used for literal citation of a text?
15) Is appropriate terminology used for the topic?
16) Are the sentences well formulated in terms of length and structure?
17) Are the verb tenses used correct?

1) Is it intelligible?
2) Is it logically coherent?
3) Is the perspective or problem analyzed a system or part of a system?
4) Are the statements literal or are they just metaphorical or analogical?
5) Can the claims be verified conceptually or empirically?
6) Does it have empirical support and is it based on specific background of the problem analyzed?
7) Is the problem or issue analyzed compatible with the specific field of knowledge?
8) Is the perspective or problem analyzed new?
9) Does the perspective or problem analyzed have heuristic capacity?

Shipping Preparation Checklist

As part of the submission process, authors are required to verify that their submission meets all of the elements shown below. Submissions that do not comply with these guidelines will be returned to the authors.

1. The Article is Original , it has not been previously published (in part or in whole) nor has it been submitted for consideration by any other magazine.
   Maximum length of 20 pages, Arial font, font size 12, single space, numbered pages, A4 paper size.

2. The first page contains : a) The title of the contribution written as a sentence and in bold, b) title in English, as a sentence without bold, in italics and in parentheses, c) below the names and surnames of the authors, d) with asterisks, for each of the authors, the institution where the work was carried out, the postal address (street, postal code, town, province, country), the email and the Digital Identifier (ORCID) will be indicated. The titles or degrees of the authors should not be stated, nor should the work belong to a specific research project, nor the subsidies received to carry it out. This data can be included in the Acknowledgments or Notes section.

3. Summary in Spanish (up to 300 words) // Keywords in Spanish (arranged alphabetically and separated by commas)
   Summary in English in italics (Abstract) // Keywords English in italics (Keywords)

   
   The Summary must respond to:
   The problem and objectives of the work, the method used to address it, the results obtained, the discussion of these and its conclusions.

4. According to the discipline or specialty, the authors may not use the titles of an original work ( Introduction, Materials and Methods, Result, Conclusions and Bibliography ). However, the work must contain perfectly identified substantive paragraphs where the issues raised in the text are mentioned. said titles.

   Titles should not be numbered .

   First level titles Arial 12 / Bold, without full stop.
   Second level titles Arial 11 / Bold, without full stop.
   Third level titles Arial 11 / Italics, without a full stop.
   Fourth level titles Arial 10 / Small caps, without a full stop.

5. The size of the figures (maps, photos, graphs, plates, drawings, etc.) and tables may be framed within 12 cm wide x 19 cm long, they must be clearly cited in the text but will not be included in it. (In the margin, the place and order of insertion will be indicated). The figures will be sent in JPG format with a minimum resolution of 300 dpi, in color and grayscale. They may only send tables and/or graphs made in Word and Excel format. Mention the sources of information in tables and graphs. In the system send as “complementary file”.

6. The legends , titles or extensive references will be written on a separate sheet accompanied by the respective consecutive numbering and in Arabic numbers, different for Figures and Tables. In the system send as “complementary file”.

   The Notes must be inserted in the work and grouped before the Bibliography. In this section, if necessary, names, numbers and other data related to projects can be clarified.

7. Citations according to the Editorial Standards:
   
   a) A single author : Eg. (Gonzáles, 1972)
   b) Two authors : Eg. (Pérez and Romero, 1979
   c) More than two authors : Eg. (Munizaga et al., 1975 )

   Bibliography according to Editorial Standards and arranged alphabetically. All bibliographic citations must appear in the text and vice versa, this is essential in marking for the different indexing sites.

   Use of the impersonal and/or neutral form in writing the text (e.g.: it was found, it is thought that, etc.)

FORMATS

The presentation of the manuscripts must conform to the following general characteristics: Word processor : Word (Microsoft Office, version 97-2003) enabled for editing; Font : Arial 12; Sheet size: A4; Margins : left: 3 cm.; right: 2.5 cm.; top 2.5 cm.; bottom: 2.5cm; Alignment : justified and without word cuts; Space spacing : simple. Do not insert any type of elements, such as header and footer, except the page number.
Do not indent, do not use underlining in any case; If you want to highlight one or more words in the text, bold should be used.

ORIGINAL RESEARCH PAPERS

Presentation of the work

The first page will contain : a) The title of the contribution written as a sentence and in bold, b) title in English, as a sentence without bold, in italics and in parentheses, c) then the names and surnames of the authors, d) with asterisks, for each of the authors, the institution where the work was carried out, the postal address (street, postal code, town, province, country), the email address and the Digital Identifier (ORCID). The titles or degrees of the authors should not be stated, nor should the work belong to a specific research project, nor the subsidies received to carry it out. This data can be included in the Acknowledgments or Notes section.
First level titles in Arial 12 / Bold, without a full stop.
Second level titles Arial 11 / Bold, without full stop.
Third level titles Arial 11 / Italics, without a full stop.
Fourth level titles l Arial 10 / Small caps, without a full stop.

Summary in Spanish and English : All contributions must include a summary in Spanish and English of 250 to 300 words maximum and must be sufficiently informative to be judged critically. The summary will contain concise paragraphs about: a) The problem being investigated and the objectives of the work; b) the method used to address it; c) the results obtained; d) the discussion of these and their conclusions.

Keywords / Keyword : These are the descriptors of the content of the manuscript and must be ordered alphabetically and separated by commas.
To the extent possible, and when the topic allows, the works should be structured as follows: a) Introduction, b) Materials and Methods, c) Results, d) Discussion, e) Conclusions, f) Acknowledgments, g) Notes, h) Bibliography, i) Annexes. See SUGGESTIONS AND GUIDELINES FOR WRITING AN ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE, details and suggestions are provided to comply with the format of an original research article for a periodical scientific publication.

Figures (maps, photos, graphs, plates, drawings, etc.) and Tables. The size of the Figures (drawings, graphs, maps, photos, etc.) and Tables may be framed within 12 cm wide x 19 cm long. The epigraphs, legends, titles or extensive references will be written in a separate file, numbered consecutively and with Arabic numbers, different for Figures and Tables. Figures and Tables must be inserted into the main Word file but must also be uploaded individually in "complementary files", in individual files. Ex. Figure 1, Figure 2, ..., Table 1, Table 2, etc.
Figures must be sent in 300 dpi in high resolution in TIF, JPG or GIF files and original color versions will be sent. Tables must be sent in Word or Excel format. Its design should be simple, with a limited number of columns to facilitate its design.

Citations in the text will be made by the author. Examples:
A single author: (Gonzales, 1972)
Two authors: (Perez and Romero, 1979)
More than two authors: (Munizaga et al., 1975)

Textual Citations are in quotes . At the end, the author(s) must be stated in the same way as the previous point. If the quote ends with ellipses and is verbatim, these must come before the quotation marks. If the author wants to clarify something within a quote, the clarification should be enclosed in square parentheses. If you want to delete something inside it, you must place ellipses in its place.

Thanks . This section indicates all the institutions and people that financially, intellectually and technically supported the research and preparation of the manuscript.

Notes should be kept to a minimum. Their numbering in Arabic numerals must be consecutive and progressive and will be inserted in the text as superscripts. Notes can be inserted from Word with the clarification that at the time of publication of the article they will be placed after the Discussion, Conclusion or Acknowledgments and before the Bibliography.

Bibliography . It should contain only the citations used in the text, which will be arranged alphabetically for publication. Below is an example of the summons form for each case. (If the journal's regulations do not contemplate a particular case, they should refer to the APA (American Psychological Association) Standards

a) Books
1. Author(s): Last name and Initial(s) of the name(s);
2. Year of publication (in parentheses, without a full stop);
3. Title of the complete book including subtitles (in lower case);
4. Edition and volume (in parentheses separated by a comma);
5. Place of publication;
6. Editorial. If it does not have a publisher it is written [sn] from the Latin “sine nomine”

Examples :
Flores de Fernández, R. (1965) History of nursing in Venezuela: Synthesis of its educational evolution. Caracas, Venezuela [sn]
Hoffman, CP and Lipkin, GB (1981) Simplified nursing. (19th ed.). Philadelphia, JB Lippincott.
Nadeau, BM (1994) Studies in the history of cutlery. (6th ed., Vol 4). San Diego, CA, USA. Academic Press.
Pan American Health Organization (1969) Technical Conference 1968: nutrition activities at the local level of a general health service. Washington, DC, USA

b) Book chapters
1. Author(s): Last name and Initial(s) of the name(s);
2. Year of publication (in parentheses without a full stop);
3. Title of the book chapter (in lower case);
4. In: (followed by the author/editor/compiler of the book - Initial of the First Name and Last Name);
5. Title of the book (in lower case);
6. Edition number and pagination (in parentheses separated by a comma);
7. Place of publication;
8. Editorial.

Example:
O'Neil, JM and Egan, J. (1992) Men's and women's gender role journeys; Metaphor for healing, transition and transformation. In: BR Wainrib (Ed.), Gender issues across the life cycle (4th ed., pp.107-123). New York, USA Springer.

c) Original Articles

In Scientific Periodical Publications
1. Author(s) of the article: Surname and Initial(s) of the name(s);
2. Year of publication (in parentheses without a full stop);
3. Title of the article (in lower case with a full stop);
4. Title of the magazine (in lower case, followed by a comma);
5. Volume (followed by a comma);
6. Number in parentheses followed by a colon;
7. Pagination (start and end page separated by a hyphen, followed by the end page by a period).

Examples:
Prieto, A. (2001) Instrument for evaluating clinical fields for professional nursing education (ECCE). Nursing Horizon, 12 (1), 11- 21.
Kernis, MH; Cornell, D.P.; Sun, C.R.; Berry, A. and Harlow, T. (1993) There's more to self-esteem than whether it is high or low: The importance of stability of self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1190-1204.

In Non-Periodic Publications (Congress Minutes)
1. Author(s) of the article: Last name and Initial(s) of the name(s);
2. Year of publication (in parentheses without a full stop);
3. Title of the article (in lower case with a full stop);
4. Title of the publication or Minutes (in lower case, followed by a comma);
5. Volume (followed by a comma);
6. Number in parentheses followed by a colon;
7. Pagination (start and end page separated by a hyphen, followed by the end page by a period).

d) Thesis
1. Author: Last name and Initial(s) of the name(s);
2. Year (in parentheses) without an end point (If the Thesis was published, the Year of publication will be considered the Year of publication, otherwise the year of approval will be placed, omitting point 6.);
3. Title of the article (in lower case with a full stop);
4. Mention of the thesis (indicate the degree you are opting for in parentheses);
5. Place;
6. Name of the School, Faculty and University;
7. Editorial;
8. Pagination (start and end page separated by a hyphen and the end page followed by a period).

Example:
Holuigue Barros, A. (1979) International capital movements: theoretical analysis and application of the Chilean case in the period 1959 - 1975. Thesis (Master in Economics). Santiago, Chile, Pontifical Catholic University of Chile, Institute of Economics, pp. 117-118.

e) Non-Scientific Periodical Publications (Newspapers, Magazines, etc.)
1. Author(s): Surname and Initial(s) of the name(s) (In the case of an article that does not have its author identified, in the point No. 1 will be the name of the media responsible for its publication);
2. Year (in parentheses) without a full stop;
3. Title of the article;
4. Name of the journal;
5. Pagination (comma), day and month.

Example:
Schwartz, J. (1993) Obesity affects economic, social status. The Washington Post, pp. 1- 4, 09/30.

f) Rules and Laws
1. Number of the law and official name if it has one;
2. Year of publication (in parentheses) without a full stop;
3. Title of the publication in which it officially appears;
4. Place of publication;
5. Date (indicate day and month).

Example:
Law No. 18525 (2003) Official Gazette El Peruano, Lima, Peru, 06/20.

g) Audiovisual Material
1. Author(s); Last name and initial of the first name (Name, in parentheses, of the function of the main people responsible; Director, Writer or Producer);
2. Year of publication (in parentheses);
3. Title of the work;
4. Expression "Movie or whatever" [in square brackets];
5. Place of origin (where it was made and published, followed by a colon);
6. Name of the Film Studio.

Example:
Scorsese, M. (Producer), and Lonergan, K. (Writer/Director) (2000) You can count on me [Movie]. United States: Paramount Pictures.

h) Digitized materials (WEB, CD, ETC)
1. Author(s): Last name and Initial of the name or NAME OF THE INSTITUTION;
2. Year of edition or publication (in parentheses);
3. Title of the original document (WEB or CD, etc.);
4. Expression "Recovered on";
5. Consultation date: day, month and year;
6. Expression "of";
7. Electronic address.

Example:
Cervantes, M. de (2001) The liberal lover. Recovered on September 13, 2002, from http://www.librosalacarta.com/pdf_gratis/El_amante_liberal.pdf

SUGGESTIONS FOR WRITING AN ORIGINAL ARTICLE

CONCEPT OF SCIENTIFIC WORK OR ORIGINAL WORK

It is a written and published report that describes original research results and has passed the test of valid publication.
An article will have been validly published if it is accepted and published by a periodical journal with a referee system. Therefore, an original work is written to satisfy the requirements of valid publication and must comply with certain style standards.
These standards define that an original work is composed of prominent and clearly distinct parts or sections. These parts are: Title – Summary – Keywords – Introduction – Objectives – Materials and Methods – Results – Discussion – Conclusions – Bibliography.
These sections are separated by the corresponding heading. According to the nature of the topic, some of these headings may eventually be omitted or replaced by others, but not the information that each one contains. These headings basically describe the articulation between theory and methodology for the construction of new knowledge and at the same time provide the tools that make it accessible to the scientific community.

QUALIFICATION

• It must contain the keywords.

• Use as few words as possible that adequately describe the content of the work.

• It should neither be too short nor too long.

• It must be significant and arouse interest.

• The words and the way of associating them (syntax) must be carefully chosen.

• The title is not a sentence, but rather functions as a label. Therefore it lacks subject, verb and complement and the terms must be limited to key words that underline the significant content of the work.

• Superfluous words should be avoided (e.g. regarding, study of, research on, observations about), abbreviations, general and imprecise terms.

SUMMARY

• It is perhaps the only section of the work that will ultimately be read.

• It is a miniature, concise version of the work that includes a summary of the information presented in each section and in the same order (Introduction and statement of the problem, Objective, Methods and Materials used, Results achieved, Discussion and Conclusions) 

• It is primarily informative, not descriptive.

• Words should be economized and details avoided (a good summary can be expressed in no more than 250 to 300 words).

• It should not contain any information or conclusions that do not appear in the work.

• It should be written using familiar vocabulary, avoiding acronyms and abbreviations.

• Does not include bibliographic citations, figures, tables, etc.

KEYWORDS

• Keywords, also known as “key concepts” or “keywords”, are a word or a combination of words with which search engine algorithms classify a work and place it in a series of categories, within a database.

• Together with the title, they are the only parts of the work used by bibliographic technical services for indexing.

• Whether the work is recovered in a bibliographic search or is found when search engines are used to find information of interest will depend on their specificity and whether they are appropriately selected.

INTRODUCTION

• Define the problem that will be investigated or analyzed, clearly stating its nature and scope.

• It includes a state of the art or current state of the problem based on an exhaustive bibliographic review that goes from the general to the particular, from the international to the local, pointing out the limitations and drawbacks.

• It must reflect exhaustive knowledge of the problem or theoretical framework on the part of the authors, which must be presented in a clear, concise and orderly manner.

• It includes the identification of propositions, categories of analysis and specific concepts, derived from the theoretical framework, linked to the objective of the work.

• All ideas expressed in the introduction must be supported by relevant bibliographical citations.

• The introduction ends with the formulation of the objectives of the work.

GOALS

• They are derived and defined from the topic or problem to be investigated presented in the introduction.

• It is the focus of the investigation.

• They can be stated as general and specific objectives, but the latter are a consequence of the former.

• It raises relevant questions to understand a topic or problem in an area of ​​knowledge and its completion represents a contribution to the knowledge accumulated in that area.

• They must be expressed in terms of results to be achieved and not activities to be carried out or purposes to be achieved.

• They are oriented towards the production of valid knowledge about a specific aspect and not towards “modifying”, “improving” or “changing”.

• The objectives preannounce the results that will be achieved.

• Design them to achieve a single result and not a number of commitments.

• Write them using action terms that suggest concrete results (Ex: achieve, determine, evaluate, etc.)

• Define them as a guide for the action to be carried out at work, that is, what will be done at work.

• To the extent possible they should be quantifiable, qualitatively or quantitatively.

• The number of objectives should be small but significant in terms of results.

• Define them according to the resources and technical capabilities available.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

• The methodological design must be consistent with the theoretical framework stated in the introduction.

• Meticulously detailed and descriptive.

• The materials and methods must be appropriate to the topic or problem to be investigated.

• The material to be used (subjects or things), its origin, technical or other specifications, special characteristics (age, sex, social status, etc.), selection, inclusion or exclusion criteria, etc. must be described.

• The methods to be applied should be described including the definition of terms, variables, categories of analysis, instruments, techniques, sequence of data collection, analyzes to be performed (statistical or otherwise).

RESULTS

• They derive from the objectives

• They must be presented or presented in order, in the same order in which the objectives were formulated.

• They objectively describe the observations, facts or data obtained, they do not interpret them

• They are short and clear

• It is not a collection of observations, facts or data, but a selection of those that are most significant.

• They can be divided into subgroupings if they are complex or extensive.

• If tables and figures are used, redundancy must be avoided, that is, not repeating in words in the text what is evident when examining the figures and tables.

DISCUSSION

• It is the least formal part of an original work where a certain “freedom of the press” is allowed, conditioned by the results achieved and the bibliography or knowledge accumulated on the subject.

• The results achieved are interpreted, not recapitulated.

• The principles, relationships and generalizations that the results indicate are presented.

• Exceptions or lack of correlation with respect to the bibliographic background on the topic are pointed out.

• It shows how the results achieved and their interpretations agree or not with already published works.

• It is speculated and explained based on the results achieved and the bibliographical background on the subject.

• The argument is based on facts and results and not on opinions or evaluative statements that must be replaced by factual statements.

• The inferences must be checked internally by reviewing the meaning and validity of the data and externally by comparing them with the conclusions of other research carried out on the topic.

• The theoretical consequences of the work and its possible practical applications are presented.

CONCLUSIONS

• They derive from the Discussion and are connected to the objectives since they confirm or not their fulfillment.

• They constitute an appropriate and very brief culmination of the Discussion.

• They clearly, concisely and categorically indicate what was demonstrated in the work without repeating the arguments of the Discussion.

• They mean the results achieved, their projection and significance.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

• All bibliographic citations must appear in the text and vice versa.

• The quote is an invocation of hierarchical scientific and academic authority.

• It is cited for scientific honesty and to avoid plagiarism.

• Demonstrates the need and opportunity for research.

WRITING AN ORIGINAL ARTICLE: SUGGESTIONS

• Plan before you start writing

1. Make a prior plan about what you want to write and how to do it

2. Select the bibliographic references that were used in the research

3. Gather data and arrange it according to a logical structure

4. Specify ideas, order them and group them

5. Judge ideas as they are written and modify or eliminate them if they do not fit the plan.

• Develop a single issue and maintain unity

1. Present a central idea

2. Do not insert accessory ideas that distract the reader's attention.

3. Finish one idea before starting another

4. Avoid contradictions between sentences, paragraphs and ideas

5. Maintain coherence between sentences and paragraphs, avoiding abrupt transitions

6. Avoid long explanatory sentences that lose the central idea

7. Maintain the overall vision by avoiding unnecessary details

• Use simple and correct words

1. Appreciate the meaning of each word

2. Consult the dictionary

3. Avoid imprecise words (Ex: could be, almost, without a doubt, most, quite a bit, etc.)

4. Avoid jargon (e.g. they are both similar because they are similar, following the current of thought headed by Smith for according to Smith, alluding to for mentioning; the vast majority of the time for almost always, a description is presented for being described, it would seem be that apparently, etc.).

• Make good corrections to the text

1. A work will be considered completed when, after reading and correcting it many times, it is impossible to convey the ideas with greater precision and clarity.

2. The clarity, precision, fluency, accuracy, objectivity, brevity, unity and coherence of the text are achieved with successive corrections

• Build short, simple sentences and paragraphs

1. That facilitate the interpretation

2. Eliminating the superfluous

3. Avoiding relative pronouns that lengthen the sentence (which, which, who, whose)

4. Not abusing expressions such as: since, therefore, now, therefore, therefore, rather, etc.

• Observe grammar and spelling rules

1. Take into account the rules of punctuation and agreement (gender and number)

2. Preferably use the impersonal form (it was obtained, it was found) since the facts are more important than the author

3. Do not abuse the gerund

4. It is advisable to use the active voice (AV) because the passive voice (VP) gives rise to the construction of weak and indirect sentences. Ex: The economy destroyed the social class (VA)/ The social class was destroyed by the economy (VP)

5. Pay attention to verb tenses. It is advisable to write in the past tense.

SUBMITTING CONTRIBUTIONS

The original research article must be uploaded to the OJS System (Open Journal System) of Revista Cuadernos FHyCS-UNJu . The author must register by entering:
http://revista.fhycs.unju.edu.ar/revistacuadernos , complete the form by checking the “author” box at the end of the form. Once registered, you can log in with your username and password and upload your contribution from your personal area. To do this, you must click on “New Shipment” and follow the steps as indicated on the site.
Contributions are received at any time of the year.
Before starting the review process, the manuscript will be subjected to a first exploratory reading to verify if it complies with the style standards and editorial requirements of the journal.
The Editor and the Editorial Committee of Cuadernos FHyCS-UNJu reserve the right to return articles that do not adapt to the established standards (see Checklist before sending the manuscript).
The text will have a maximum length of 20 pages including the bibliography. , figures and tables.