ISSN 2346-9641 |
|
Scope and policy
Lilloa is a biannual scientific journal of the Miguel Lillo Foundation (Tucumán, Argentina), its online version publishes in June and December. The journal, that was first published in 1937, has the aim of disseminating original scientific papers and review articles (not simultaneously sent to another journal) on botany, mycology and phycology, including ecological, anatomical, physiological, cytological, genetic, palynological, phytogeographical, paleobotanical and applied botany issues. The journal is open to papers that contribute to the knowledge of national and international scientific research. It is intended for researchers, professionals and students of the biological sciences and related disciplines. Accepted contributions will be in the form of articles, reviews, communication or note in Spanish, English or Portuguese. Manuscripts are evaluated by external referees following the “double-blind” process. The articles and volumes have individual DOI (Digital Object Identifier) provided by CROSSREF. The full content of the journal is available in the Institutional Repository of the Fundación Miguel Lillo (http://www.lillo.org.ar). Persistent identifiers The journal uses digital object identifiers (DOI) for its articles by the membership that the Miguel Lillo Foundation has (Publishers International Linking Association, Inc.), through which the Crossref service is provided. Peer review process Articles are initially reviewed by our Editorial Committee, which verifies the compliance with the formal requirements of the editorial policy: verify their originality and relevance to the scope of the journal and adequacy to the instructions for authors. The date when the fulfilment of the required conditions has been verified will be recorded as the date of receipt of the manuscript and an Editor specialized in the subject matter of the article will be assigned. All works received will be submitted to a double-blind review process, that is to say, the reviewers do not know the identity of the authors, and authors do not know the identity of the reviewers. The reviewers are specialists with expertise in the subject matter of the research work, external to the editorial board, who have a maximum of 4 weeks to return corrections and suggestions. When there is a divergence of views, a third reviewer will be consulted, and the final decision will always be made by the Editorial board. The final decision about the publication of articles and reviews is made on the basis of the expert opinions expressed by the external referees, for which two positive recommendations are required. The possible decisions are:
The observations and criticisms of the referees are evaluated by the Editor, who informs the corresponding author of the result of the evaluation, together with editorial observations. If the manuscript is evaluated as "Publishable with minor changes" the authors must submit a modified version to the journal in a maximum period of 4 (four) weeks, so that the Editorial Committee together with the reviewers can analyze the manuscript again. In addition, a note will be sent to the editor detailing the changes made. The final acceptance of the papers depends on strict compliance with the journal's requirements, on the authors' responses to the reviewers' commentaries, and on compliance with ethical standards and good practices. The first editorial decision will be communicated within 45-60 days after receipt of the manuscript. The online version will be published within a maximum period of six months. Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement The present statement of Publication Ethics and Malpractices involves all those who participate in Lilloa: Director, Editorial Committee, author/s, reviewers and production team. This journal follows the guidelines of good practices suggested by the COPE Committee on Publication Ethics Members’ full names, affiliations and contact information are provided in the journal’s website. Lilloa Editorial Board In Lilloa, the Director, in the first instance and then, the members of the editorial committee are responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published, and which not. The decision to publish is made exclusively on the basis of author’s academic merit and reviewers’ decisions. Peer review helps the editor in making decisions and it may also assist the author in improving the paper. Members of the editorial committee should follow these ethical guidelines, reflecting the current editorial policies of the journal. Ethical guidelines for the Director and Editorial Committee Members Editors will evaluate the scientific content and merits of the manuscripts based solely on the intellectual rigor of the content regardless of race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ethnicity, citizenship or political philosophy of the authors. Furthermore, they will ensure that the peer review process is fair and impartial by selecting suitable reviewers. Conflicts of Interest and Confidentiality/Non-Disclosure Agreement Upon receiving the manuscripts to be considered for publication, the members of the editorial team are committed to maintaining confidentiality, as well as not to disclose information on the content of the manuscripts, which will be discussed with the author, reviewers and other editorial members, as appropriate. Manuscripts that present a conflict of interest will not be accepted, either due to problems resulting from competitive and collaborative relationships, or connections with any of the authors or institutions related to the documents. If this situation arises, the director must declare a conflict of interest. The director takes ethical misconduct seriously, especially when there are complaints of breach of confidentiality, plagiarism, self-plagiarism, failure to declare interests, inappropriate use of confidential material, or in the event of a delay in peer-review process to achieve a competitive advantage. The director and the entire team involved in the editorial process guarantee the confidentiality of the data of the authors and reviewers, as well as any information about the manuscripts submitted to Lilloa. The editor will inform and apologize to the authors for the existence of a conflict of interest. To avoid conflicts of interest, funding sources and affiliations of the authors must be taken into account, to select reviewers who do not belong to the same academic and/or scientific affiliations that the authors. The director and editors should not use unpublished information for his/her own benefit without the authors’ consent or approval. For Authors
Fundamental errors in works that have already been published: In the event that an author finds any error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is his/her obligation to immediately notify the editor of the journal and cooperate with him/her to publish a retraction or correction (errata). Publication Ethics Authors should only submit documents if the work was done ethically and responsibly. Ethics for Reviewers Reviewers collaborate with the editor on editorial decisions and undertake to evaluate the manuscript honestly, objectively, and critically in order to help and/or empower the author to improve the article. Reviewers should carefully evaluate the intellectual content of the manuscript received, including the research methodology and procedures, taking into account the same ethical and confidentiality recommendations stated in the section "for editors". Reviewers should notify the editor of any conflict of interest, about their difficulty in providing a quick review, and even indicate their lack of suitability or experience to review the manuscript. Reviewers will avoid suggesting citations of their own articles in order to expand citations beyond themselves and their research group. Reviewers should report suspected plagiarism or ethical breach. Interoperability protocols Lilloa has interoperability protocols, OAI and Dublin Core: http://www.lillo.org.ar/journals/index.php/lilloa/oai?verb=ListMetadataFormats Note: Dublin Core metadata is embedded in the <head> header of the HTML code for the harvester. |
Form and preparation of manuscripts
Submission Preparation Checklist As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.
Author Guidelines General information Lilloa is a biannual scientific journal of the Miguel Lillo Foundation (Tucumán, Argentina), its online version publishes in June and December. The journal, that was first published in 1937, has the aim of disseminating original scientific work (not simultaneously submitted to another journal) on botany, mycology and phycology, including ecological, anatomical, physiological, cytological, genetic, palynological, phytogeographical, paleobotanical and applied botany issues. The journal is open to papers that contribute to the knowledge of national and international scientific research. It is intended for researchers, professionals and students of the biological sciences and related disciplines. Accepted contributions will be in the form of articles, reviews, communication or notes in Spanish, Portuguese or English. Manuscripts are evaluated by external referees following the “double-blind” process. Lilloa provides open access to all its content with no publication fees for authors. Manuscripts must be submitted electronically through our editorial platform (http://www.lillo.org.ar/journals/index.php/lilloa). In Comments to the Editor, you must suggest the names of four potentials reviewers indicating their updated mail addresses. The email revistalilloa@lillo.org.ar can only be used to communicate other matters, but not for submitting manuscripts. The editorial process involves different stages, from a preliminary evaluation of the manuscript (originality, topicality, quality and presentation) managed by associate editors and the Director. The refereeing process is double-blind, in which two external referees evaluate online the content. After receiving the report from the referees, the Editor informs the author about the decision and is also in charge of formatting the text according to the journal’s style guide. The author and journal’s editors are responsible for checking the galley proofs. It should be clarified that although referees make decisions on their peers’ work, the final decision is made by the Director.
In the organizational structure of the text, it is advisable to maintain the following order: Title, Abbreviated Title, Author(s), Abstracts and Keywords (in the three languages that the journal publishes), Introduction, Material(s) and Method(s), Results, Discussions, Conclusions, Acknowledgements, Conflicts of interest and References. If the topic requires it, the proposed structure may vary but always respecting the order. Style guidelines are summarized below for every single part of this structure. If you have any questions or queries, please do not hesitate to contact us at revistalilloa@lillo.org.ar Title The title of the article must be written in title-case letters and bold. Names of species and genera must be in italics without identifying the author(s). Names of vascular plants must be followed by the family name in brackets (including subfamilies or tribes, if applicable) separated by commas. Names of the taxa of non-vascular plants, fungi and lichens are followed by the name of division and order, or family, in brackets and separated by a comma. If a specific geographical region is mentioned, the name of the country should be added in brackets, if it is necessary add the corresponding political subdivision. When the work is written in Spanish or Portuguese will also include the title in English; in the same way, in case of writing in English will include the title in Spanish or Portuguese. Abbreviated Title Include an abbreviated title “running title” in the header of odd pages. Abstract and keywords Articles must preserve the order: Abstract and Keywords. The abstract should consist of a single paragraph (without full stops) with a maximum of 300 words; it must be a brief explanation of the purpose and relevance of the study, materials and methods, main results and conclusions. Works containing nomenclatural novelties must be indicated in this section. Keywords must be arranged alphabetically, separated by a semicolon; their number may vary from three to five, compound words will not be considered. It is also recommended to avoid the use of words included in the title. GENERAL TEXT The manuscript must follow the structure specified in the “Manuscript Preparation and Text Formatting”. Use only two levels of headings: first-level headings (INTRODUCTION, MATERIAL AND METHODS, RESULTS AND DISCUSSION, CONCLUSION, ACKNOWLEDGMENTS, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, REFERENCES) and second-level headings. First-level headings must be centred, all-capitalized, and without full stop. Second-level headings must be in a separated line, left-aligned, written in lower-case, and in bold. In the case of needing more levels of headings, number them hierarchically (e.g. 1.1, 1.2, 1.2.1., and so on). Latin names of genera, species and intraspecific categories must be written in italics except for abbreviations such as sp. nov., comb. nov., var., s. l., s. str., ex. Diacritical marks of the different languages must be respected (umlaut, acute, accent), even for upper case letters. Sentences should not begin with abbreviations. Numbers must be written in Arabic numerals, except for numbers up to 10 or when they are used at the beginning of a sentence, in which case it is necessary to spell them out, for example, three, seven. TAXONOMIC TREATMENTS Nomenclature shall be governed by the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature. The bibliographic citation and synonymy of the taxa should be made as indicated in www.tropicos.org. Use a paragraph per basionym. If the author proposes a lectotypification, a new synonym or a new combination must be specified by saying “lectotype here designated” “syn. nov.”, or “comb. nov.”, respectively. Keys must be strictly dichotomous and left-justified with no indentation. Remember that dilemmas are not descriptions. Keys must be coincident with every taxonomic description and the characters of those dilemmas must be properly opposed. 1 Leaf primordia large, apical to subapical ............................................ P. pseudobarbula Studied Material To mention sample data, the following order must be maintained: Country (in full uppercase), province, locality, geographic coordinates, altitude, date (the month in Roman numerals), collector and number (in italics), an acronym that identifies the collection where the material is deposited (in uppercase and enclosed in brackets). Example: ARGENTINA. Prov. Tucuman, Dpto. Tafí del Valle, 26º46'33.1''S 65º43'45.3''W, 2798 m asl, 07-VI-2009, Campero 234 (LIL). If the number of specimens is high, the citing of only one specimen per location is recommended. FIGURES Figures (graphics, drawings, and photographs) should be sequentially numbered with Arabic numerals. In the case of a figure composed of multiple images, number them consecutively, e.g., Figs. 1A, 1B and so on. Size: the figures must fit the printing area of the journal page: maximum width of 15 cm, maximum height of 20 cm. Do not add black borders to photographs or drawings. The photographs or drawings must be sent arranged in figures, which must be grouped leaving a vertical of horizontal spacing margin of 2 mm between them. Figures should include a scale. In order to characterize the elements of each figure, capital letters will be used in the lower right corner, and in order to indicate particular details of each photo or graphic, letters or abbreviations in lower case will be used. Use only Arial font. The size of letters is 2-4 mm (8-12 pt) size, keeping the same font sizes in the different figures and graphics of the article. The typography will be in white or black depending on the background color. If there is not a good contrast between the letters and the photos, you should place the capital letters on a white square that highlights it and the lower case letters of minor references on a circle with rounded edges. Photographs should have sharp focus and high contrast. Each figure, with all the elements arranged on sheets, must be attached as complementary files (separate/individual photographs are nor accepted). Image files must be in TIFF or JPG format, with 300 dpi resolution. Place the figure captions on a separate page at the end of the text, they must be preceded by the name of the species (without authors), at the end of it indicate collector name, number and herbarium where it is deposited. As shown in the example: Fig. 1. Zinnia peruviana. General appearance. A) Inflorescence of orange ligules. Opposite decussate phyllotaxy. B) Inflorescence of red ligules. C) Inflorescence of yellow ligules. Ponessa and Mercado S/N (LIL). TABLES Table width and height must respected espect the journal’s margins, which are 15 cm × 21.5 cm, or the width of a column 7.2 cm. Each table must be submitted as an Excel file. Tables will be numbered with Arabic numerals. The title should be located at the top of the table. Lowercase letters will be used for table footnotes. Tables can be done with Excel or with the Word Table tool for Windows. The captions of the Figures and Tables must be in Spanish (or in the original language of the authors) and English. Conflicts of interest REFERENCES AND CITATIONS Citations and bibliographic references, should follow APA Style guidelines (http://www.apastyle.org/). In-Text citations Include the last name of the author and year of publication. If there are two authors, include both last names and the year (e.g., de la Rosa & Messuti, 2014). For more than three authors, cite the last name of the first author followed by "et al." (e.g., Silva Araújo et al., 2010). In the case of corporate authorship (institutions, ministries, agencies, civil society organizations, companies), cite the full name of the organization the first time it appears with the abbreviation indicated in square brackets [e.g., World Bank [BM] (1991)]. Thereafter, use the abbreviation only (e.g., BM, 1991). In the case of multiple sources, cite them in a chronological order, and separate each source with a semicolon (e.g., Domínguez, 1928; Toursarkissian, 1980; for the Lahitte & Hurrell, 1996; Alonso & Desmarchelier, 2005; Barboza et al., 2006, 2009). In the case of multiple citations of the same author in the same year, indicate the year accompanied by a letter (e.g., 2011a, 2011b). For unpublished personal communications, include the full name of the referent followed by the abbreviation "pers. comm." and the year (e.g., Albornoz, "pers. comm.", 2007). Bibliographic references The bibliography will include all works cited in the text, alphabetically ordered, and using indentation. Each citation begins with the last name of the first author. If there are several citations of the same author, cite them chronologically. In the case of co-authors, follow this order: first, publications of the author only; second, publications of the author and a co-author; then publications of the author with two or more co-authors, and so on. When sources share the same author(s) and year of publication sort by location and sequence in the text by adding a letter after the year (e.g., 2011a, 2011b). Use the following APA style formats: Format for citing periodicals Giudice, G. E. (1999). Synopsis of the Argentinean species of the genus Adiantum (Pteridaceae, Pteridophyta). Darwiniana 37: 279-300. de la Rosa, I. N. & Sampedro Arrubla, M. I. (2014). The species of the genus Lecanora (Ascomycota, Lecanoraceae) in the province of Tucumán (Argentina). Lilloa 51 (1): 33-45. Cibils L., Prince, R., Márquez, J., Gari, N. & Albariño, R. (2015). Functional diversity of algal communities from headwater grassland streams: How does it change following afforestation? Aquatic Ecology 49: 453-466. doi: 10.1007/s10452-015-9538-z. Format for citing Books Lee, R. E. (2008). Phycology. (5° Ed). Cambridge University Press. Format for citing chapters of books Sirombra, M. G. (2007). Aspectos ecológicos de humedales. A functional approach. In: D. Cicerone, M. V. Hidalgo (Eds.), Los Humedales de la Cuenca del Río Salí. Argentina (pp. 67-83). Buenos Aires: Jorge Baudino Editions. Format for citing electronic sources Thiers, B. (2015) Index Herbariorum: a global directory of public herbal and The associated staff. New York Botanical Garden's Virtual Herbarium. Retrieved from http://sweetgum.nybg.org/ih Zuloaga, F. O., Morrone, O., Belgrano, M. J. (2006). Dioscorea (Dioscoreaceae) Catálogo de las plantas vasculares de Argentina. Instituto de Botánica Darwinion. Retrieved from http://www.floraargentina.edu.ar. Personal communications should be cited within the text, but not included in the list of references. Theses and Dissertations Suárez, G. M. (2008). Sistematica y Filogenia de las especies neotropicales del género Pohlia (Musci). (Doctoral dissertation), National University of Tucumán, Argentina. GRAPHIC SUMMARY Once the final work is accepted, you must send the following information for the preparation of the graphic summary in order to promote your article on social networks.
That only figure may result from the integration of one or more figures of the article. Image file must be in JPG format, 300 dpi resolution. The figure does not have a legend, so it must be interpreted by itself. Submit this content by mail to revistalilloa@lillo.org.ar View an example about graphic summary publish in Lilloa. ACCEPTANCE AND PUBLICATION Submissions that do not meet these guidelines will not be accepted by the journal. Once the evaluation is done by the external referees, manuscripts requiring corrections will be returned to the authors for revision. If the manuscript is evaluated as accepted with revisions or modifications, the authors must submit a modified version to the journal in a maximum period of 3 (three) weeks, so that the Editorial together with the reviewers can analyze the manuscript again. In addition, a note will be sent to the editor detailing the changes made. When the final work is accepted, other corrections or amendments will not be admitted, except in the case that an important contribution on the subject appears in the time between submission and acceptance, it will be included as an addendum. The page proofs will be sent by email in PDF format. Authors can indicate corrections in the same PDF. The revision of the page proofs is under the sole responsibility of the author. Editors shall not be responsible for any loss of works, neither the Miguel Lillo Foundation nor any of its members ELECTRONIC OFFPRINT The author will receive an electronic copy of his or her article published in Lilloa, in PDF format. This measure replaces the distribution of printed copies. |
Sending of manuscripts
[Home] [About the journal] [Editorial Board] [Subscription]
2024 Fundación Miguel Lillo
Miguel Lillo 251
T4000JFE - San Miguel de Tucumán
Tucumán - Argentina
TEL: 54 - 0381 - 451 8497
https://www.lillo.org.ar/
fundacion@lillo.org.ar
SciELO Argentina URL: http://www.scielo.org.ar/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=2346-9641&lng=es&nrm=iso