SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 issue27Reading practices: Contributions for a reflecting and intervening upon built patrimonyCity and heritage: practices and tensions in the historic center of San Miguel de Tucumán, Argentina (1990-2019) author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

  • Have no cited articlesCited by SciELO

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Astrolabio. Nueva Época

On-line version ISSN 1668-7515

Abstract

BRACCO, Mercedes González  and  HERNANDEZ, Silvia. ¿Patrimonializar o despatrimonializar? El rol de la cultura urbana en la ciudad neoliberal. Buenos Aires (1990-2020). Astrolabio [online]. 2021, n.27, pp.27-52. ISSN 1668-7515.  http://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55441/1668.7515.n27.30640.

Abstract

Starting from a series of case-examples of the City of Buenos Aires over the last 30 years, we propose to demonstrate that, in a dominant way, the public recognition of the legitimacy and need for a “enhancement” or a “reactivation of heritage” does not depend so much on the value that can be given to a building, an area or an institution based on any of its intrinsic qualities, but rather on the effectiveness that this heritage-making process has in the construction of an image of a place or neighborhood as "attractive”, “authentic”, and on the intensification of the expansion of tourist or cultural consumption circuits and of real estate interests. This article aims to show that social recognition and duration in time of patrimonial value are based on the relationship between those authenticity and identity features given to urban goods and wider processes of requalification of the area in which they are located. As we will see, in some cases, heritage-making processes operate as the spearhead of such requalifications; in others, as their reinforcements.

For this, some cases of “successful” places, areas and practices (that is, that were publicly recognized as “heritage” even regardless of their historical or cultural qualities and that managed to last in the time hand in hand with its economic revaluation or its symbolic impact on the surrounding area) are presented. As counterexamples, other cases are then analyzed that, despite having some characteristics that would make them susceptible to being publicly recognized as “heritage” (age, community value, among others), were made invisible, destroyed or transformed without appealing to its patrimonial condition, within the framework of other dynamics or temporalities of urban requalification.

Keywords : Heritage; Urban Requalification; Commodification of Urban Space; Heritage Making Strategies; City of Buenos Aires.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )