SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 issue29Analysis of the Quality of Eggs Available in the Supermarkets and Stored at Different TemperaturesImpact of rainfall on the Chambas Basin, Ciego de Ávila, Cuba author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

  • Have no cited articlesCited by SciELO

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Revista de Ciencia y Tecnología

On-line version ISSN 1851-7587

Abstract

GOULART NISHIMURA, Paula Lumi; BOTURA JUNIOR, Galdenoro; RODRIGUES, Osmar Vicente  and  GARCIA FERRARI, Livia. Process, complexity and quality: comparison between similar objects produced by different Rapid Prototyping technologies. Rev. cienc. tecnol. [online]. 2018, n.29, pp.50-56. ISSN 1851-7587.

Rapid Prototyping technologies, besides producing pieces with complex geometries and with high dimensional accuracy, can optimize the development process of a product by providing tests and improving communication among the people involved in the project. This article presents and discusses two Rapid Prototyping technologies, one additive and another subtractive (CNC milling), used in the production of two pieces from the same digital file. These pieces were compared, considering parameters such as: production time, cost, material and fidelity regarding the original file. The results show that additive technology is recommended for models with complex geometries or that require internal details, whereas the subtractive technology is characterized by lower production cost, better surface finish and diversity of material use, making the choice of one or another technology for a specific project depend on the objectives for which the prototype is being produced.

Keywords : Rapid prototyping; Additive technology; CNC milling; 3D scanning; Manufacturing.

        · abstract in Portuguese | Spanish     · text in Portuguese     · Portuguese ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License