SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.22 issue2Glosas del discurso legal acerca de derechos subjetivos author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

  • Have no cited articlesCited by SciELO

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Análisis filosófico

On-line version ISSN 1851-9636

Abstract

BULYGIN, Eugenio. El silencio del derecho. Anal. filos. [online]. 2002, vol.22, n.2, pp.103-114. ISSN 1851-9636.

According to Raz there are no legal gaps originating in the silence of law. Such gaps require that there should be no reason to perform an action and no conclusive permission to omit that action. Raz claims that such a situation leads to a contradiction and hence is impossible. This means that aIl legal systems are necessarily complete. In this paper I argue that (1) the Razian argument against gaps begs the question, (2) the concept of conclusive pennission is inadequate for characterizing completeness and gaps and must be replaced by a stronger notion, and (3) legal gaps due to the absence of legal regulations are possible and hence the problem of completeness of legal systems is an empirical question that cannot be sol ved by logical means alone.

Keywords : Normative system; Completeness; Legal graps; Pennissions; Clousure rule.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License