SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.29 issue2Definite descriptions, misdescriptions and semantic content: different ways to solve a tricky puzzleProcedural meaning and definite descriptions author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

  • Have no cited articlesCited by SciELO

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Análisis filosófico

On-line version ISSN 1851-9636

Abstract

SKERK, Laura C.. A plea for (purely) singular propositions: The cases of belief correction and de re attitude reports. Anal. filos. [online]. 2009, vol.29, n.2, pp.167-172. ISSN 1851-9636.

In this paper I assume that it is reasonable to claim, as Michael Devitt does, that a definite description can express, in certain contexts, a genuinely referential meaning, but I discuss the requisite, also defended by Devitt, that the predicates involved in the description at stake should apply to the referred object. In so doing, I consider some cases of sentences containing definite descriptions constituted by general terms that, strictly speaking, don't apply to the intended object but are nonetheless intuitively true. Along these lines, in the last paragraphs, I suggest that the role of the predicative material of a referential definite description can be regarded as secondary or instrumental, a mere guide to the identification of the object referred to.

Keywords : Definite description; Referential meaning; Singular proposition.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in English     · English ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License