SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.34 issue1Has Political Equality Really Any Value?On Fregean Sense and Mental Content author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

  • Have no cited articlesCited by SciELO

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Análisis filosófico

On-line version ISSN 1851-9636

Abstract

DE BRASI, Leandro. Contextualism and Testimony. Anal. filos. [online]. 2014, vol.34, n.1, pp.61-75. ISSN 1851-9636.

It has recently been argued that Subject-Sensitive Invariantism conflicts with an attractive testimonial principle of transmission. One might think, given the differences between Subject-Sensitive Invariantism and Contextualism, the latter would not be susceptible to related objections. I argue however that some testimonial principles with much intuitive appeal give us a related though different reason to reject Contextualism. In short, while some argue that Subject-Sensitive Invariantism seems to sometimes make testimonial knowledge too easy to come by, I argue that Contextualism seems to often make testimonial knowledge too hard to come by. Contextualism then does not enjoy an advantage over Subject-Sensitive Invariantism when it comes to capturing the transmissive role of knowledge.

Keywords : Epistemic Contextualism; Subject-Sensitive Invariantism; Testimonial Knowledge; Defeaters.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in English     · English ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License