Abstract

RUDY HILLER, Fernando. Assertion, Justificatory Commitment, and Trust. Anal. filos. [online]. 2016, vol.36, n.1, pp.29-53. ISSN 1851-9636.

This paper discusses the commitment account of assertion (CAA), according to which two necessary conditions for asserting that p are the speaker's undertaking a commitment to justify her assertion in the face of challenges and the speaker's licensing the audience to defer justificatory challenges back to her. Relying on what I call the "cancellation test," and focusing on Robert Brandom's version of the CAA, I show that the latter is wrong: it is perfectly possible to assert that p even while explicitly disavowing the justificatory commitment and while refusing to issue a deferring license. Then I sketch an alternative to the CAA, the trust account of assertion, according to which speakers necessarily present themselves as trustworthy concerning p's truth whenever they assert p. I explain why this is different from undertaking a justificatory commitment, and offer some reasons for thinking that this is a more promising account.

Keywords : Asserting; Justification; Brandom; Inferentialism; Trustworthiness.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in English     · English ( pdf )