SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.28 issue1Soil loss as a result of the interactions between natural landscape attributes and human activities in Ventania, ArgentinaUsing beta-diversity to differentiate neutral from niche community assembly[ign]. [abstract language="en"]According to the niche theory, species assemblies should reflect biotic and abiotic local conditions. In turn, the neutral theory of biodiversity stands that species are equivalent and that local species assembly is the product of colonization and extinction rates. After some years of debate, nowadays, ecologists agree that purely niche or neutral assemblies rarely occur in nature and, in turn, that the rule are assemblies somewhere in the middle. A niche assembly is the product of interspecific interactions or environmental forcing, while a neutral assembly is derived from intrinsic population dynamics (e.g., colonization and extinction rates). The beta-diversity concept (it has various definitions, but all of them share the idea of a link between local [alpha] and regional [gamma] diversity, and, thus, refers to the heterogeneity in species composition between places or times) has become particularly popular during the last decade. It is used to analyze a great variety of systems in different ways. In particular, it gained attention as a tool to differentiate niche- vs neutral-based species assembly. This could be easily addressed using ad hoc neutral models. A pure neutral assembly should exhibit a variability in species composition similar to that expected by randomly selecting species from the regional pool (gamma diversity) for each sample (alpha diversity). The more deviant from the variability expected by chance, the more niche-based assembly. We have greatly expanded our knowledge of the factors that promote one or the other type of assembly. However, there is still much more to elucidate, like how neutral vs. niche assembly is influenced by the interaction between factors, spatio-temporal relationships or if there are scale-dependent variations. In this review, we analyze the potential uses and methodologies associated with this emerging topic in community ecology and discuss some related and interesting scientific questions that remain unanswered. [ign]Keywords: [keygrp scheme="nd"][keyword type="m" language="en"]Ecological niche[ign]; [keyword type="m" language="en"]Neutral theory[ign]; [keyword type="m" language="en"]Diversity patterns[ign]; [keyword type="m" language="en"]Null model[ign].[ign] author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

  • Have no cited articlesCited by SciELO

Related links

Share


Ecología austral

On-line version ISSN 1667-782X

Abstract

MINERVINI, Mariana G; MORRAS, Héctor J. M  and  TABOADA, Miguel A. Effects of fire on the soil matrix: Consequences on soil physical and mineralogical properties. Ecol. austral [online]. 2018, vol.28, n.1, pp.12-27. ISSN 1667-782X.

Fires constitute disturbances of very diverse origin and varied implications. In addition to the effects on vegetation, fires can affect the components and properties of soils. Changes in soils, in turn, tend to increase erosion processes, sediment transport and, as a consequence, floods. Most of the studies on edaphic fire impacts have been focused on the effects on organic matter and other chemical properties and to a lesser extent on the effects on physical and mineralogical properties. The purpose of this work has been to review the state of the art in the literature on the latter effects that have been less explored. It has been found that the soil depth affected, as well as the magnitude of the changes, depend on the fire intensity and the temperature thresholds of its organic and mineral components. The physical characteristic of the soil most affected by fire is the structure or organization of aggregates. Likewise, increases in hydrophobicity occur in burned soils. Both effects modify, in turn, the water properties of the soils, reducing the infiltration and increasing the risks of erosion. Longterm heating at elevated temperatures can lead to microaggregation of the mineral particles, resulting in the generation of coarser pseudo-textures in the surface horizon. Under these conditions, clay minerals are also affected, with a decrease in kaolinite content and transformation of the expandable minerals. Although studies are scarce, modifications have also been observed in iron oxy-hydroxides, including modifications in magnetic properties in the topsoil. Effects on iron compounds may lead to changes in soil color, which may be indicative of fire intensity. Recent works also show the cracking of grains of the sand fraction as a consequence of the repetition of high temperature fires. This review highlights research needs regarding the effects of fire on inorganic soil components, which were less considered up to present. The synthesis carried out often shows contradictory results among the different works, which is due to the different constitutive properties of the soils, the different types of fires and their multiple combination possibilities.

Keywords : Fires; Soil structure; Aggregation; Porosity; Hydrophobicity; Texture; Minerals; Color.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License