SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.23 issue2Leadership in the succession process: the case of a family business from mexicoTrends and brazility at female beach fashion collection author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

  • Have no cited articlesCited by SciELO

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Visión de futuro

Print version ISSN 1668-8708On-line version ISSN 1669-7634

Abstract

MALDONADO MERA, Betzabé del Rosario; BUENANO CABRERA, José Javier  and  BENAVIDES ESPINOSA, Karla Viviana. Approximation to a model of governance in public universities of the province of Pichincha of Ecuador. Vis. futuro [online]. 2019, vol.23, n.2. ISSN 1668-8708.

In the last decade, relevant changes have been observed in the Ecuador higher education system, whose dynamics have influenced in important transformations within the universities. This work follows the lines of research from an internal governance perspective, to make an approximation to the prevailing models in the universities that participate in the study. This work follows the lines of research from an internal government perspective, to make an approximation to the prevailing models in the universities that participate in the study. The analysis is carried out from a systemic approach, from where the term governance is associated with the capacity of the government to define the task of higher education institutions and the forms of internal organization to fulfill the role granted. The study is eminently qualitative documentary type, based on information sources obtained from official websites of universities and various higher education organizations. In a complementary manner, a questionnaire is apply through an interview with advisors from the same institutions, in order to ratify or qualify the conclusions generated. For the analysis, the principles of governance, autonomy, academic freedom, accountability, participation and institutional representation are considered. The results revealed that even though the three HEIs involved in the study are public and domiciled in the same province, they differ in the manner in which these principles are exercised. This intensity determines different forms of organization and models of internal operation.

Keywords : University governance; University autonomy; Higher education.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in English | Spanish

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License