SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.13 issue37University Rankings: Global Quality and Local ContextsInternational University Rankings and Conflicts Regarding the Regulation of Higher Education author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

  • Have no cited articlesCited by SciELO

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Revista iberoamericana de ciencia tecnología y sociedad

On-line version ISSN 1850-0013

Abstract

PEREZ RASETTI, Carlos. What the Rankings Say about the Teaching Function in Universities. Rev. iberoam. cienc. tecnol. soc. [online]. 2018, vol.13, n.37, pp.53-65. ISSN 1850-0013.

University rankings assess, grade and hierarchically organize institutions that traditionally bear three significant functions: teaching, research and outreach. What I try to examine in this article is how and with what limitations do the rankings say something about the quality of the teaching function. It is easy to determine that most of them focus on indicators that show research capabilities and results, but when they include teaching they often do so with indirect indicators, and at least two issues underline all of the above: that, in general, rankings associate the quality of the teaching with research potential, and that the availability of standardized, legitimized and interpreted information conditions the selection of indicators that make up the rankings, discarding the teaching specifics because they do not meet these criteria

Keywords : Rankings; Teaching; Universities; Research.

        · abstract in Spanish | Portuguese     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License