SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.26 issue2Impact of cattle grazing on soil mechanical resistance in production systems under continuous no-till author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

  • Have no cited articlesCited by SciELO

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Ciencia del suelo

On-line version ISSN 1850-2067

Abstract

VIDELA, Lina Sonia; ROSTAGNO, César Mario  and  TOYOS, María Alicia. Particulate organic-matter: a comparison of methods for its determination and its role as an indicator of soil quality for some soils in the province of Chubut. Cienc. suelo [online]. 2008, vol.26, n.2, pp.219-227. ISSN 1850-2067.

Particulate organic-matter (MOP) is a dynamic soil component that quickly and selectively responds to management changes and to different disturbance regimes. We compared two techniques to determine the MOP content in different soils and assessed the potential of this variable as an indicator of soil quality. We studied the soils of three ecological sites located in the province of Chubut under different management schemes or affected by different disturbance regimes: Media Luna exclosure (MLC), Media Luna-grazing (MLP), Puerto Madryn bioturbed (PMB), Puerto Madryn nonbioturbed (PMNB), Punta Ninfas uneroded (PNNE) and Punta Ninfas eroded (PNE). We collected soil samples from the 0 to 5 cm (PM and PN) or 0 to 10 cm (ML) depths to determine total soil organic-matter (MOT) and MOP using wet combustion MOPh (Walkley and Black method) and weight loss-on-ignition in a high temperature oven set at 430° C (MOPi). In the Mollisols and the Aridisols from Puerto Madryn, MOPi was higher than MOPh; in the Aridisols from Punta Ninfas, however, the differences between MOPi and MOPh were not significant. In soils with high calcium carbonate (PMB and PMNB) or allophane (MLC and MLP) contents, the loss-on-ignition method overestimated MOP contents. The MOT contents were highly correlated to both MOPh and MOPi for all soils (r2= 0.89 and r2 = 0.73, respectively). Both MOT and MOP were sensitive to land management and soil erosion. The soil that displayed the greatest MOP/ MOT ratio was the PNNE. On the contrary, the PNE site showed the lowest values for this ratio, which would indicate that the low MOT content of this soil is predominantly associated to the < 0.053 mm fraction, and that the erosion process decreased the MOP reserves more than the MOT. For the Puerto Madryn soils, the MOPi / MOT ratio was greater than 1. This seems to be mainly due to the overestimation of the loss-on-ignition method in soils with abundant carbonates. Both MOT and MOP, determined by the two methods, can be used to detect differences in management or the state of soil degradation. However, MOP seemed to be more affected by soil erosion and sheep grazing compared to MOT. These results would allow us to consider MOP as a good indicator of changes in soil quality by either soil erosion or sheep grazing.

Keywords : Disturbance; Management; Erosion; Bioturbation.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License