SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 issue50To politicize in “not very politicized” contexts: paradoxes and tension regarding the development of the power to act in French social centersA police officer ready for anything. Establishing links between police training and practice in the province of Santa Fe author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

  • Have no cited articlesCited by SciELO

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Cuadernos de antropología social

On-line version ISSN 1850-275X

Abstract

RAMOS, Alcida Rita. Methodologies. Neither for nor against, much to the contrary. Cuad. antropol. soc. [online]. 2019, n.50, pp.21-31.  Epub Dec 19, 2019. ISSN 1850-275X.  http://dx.doi.org/10.34096/cas.i50.7018.

The thorny issue of methodology has haunted many a social scientist, among them, anthropologists. Hard to define, method is often confused with research techniques; students and professionals alike very frequently propose, for instance, participant observation as their privileged “method”. However, there are striking differences between method and technique. Method is a guide, an organizer of research procedures. At the same time, it reveals the researchers’ inclinations towards their objects. This paper comments on the use of methodology, presents outstanding cases of its appropriate use, and gives examples of indigenous methodologies as counter examples, stressing the indigenous way of doing research, usually permeated with histories of subjugation, humiliation, generalized violence, and dehumanization inflicted on nonwestern peoples who happen to be in the way of western expansion and conquest.

Keywords : Anthropological research; Ethnography; Indigenous methodologies; Serendipity; Epistemology.

        · abstract in Portuguese | Spanish     · text in Portuguese     · Portuguese ( pdf )