SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 issue29El nativo relativoCuando humanos y no-humanos componen el Pasado: Ontohistoria en el Chaco author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

  • Have no cited articlesCited by SciELO

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Avá

On-line version ISSN 1851-1694

Abstract

DOS SANTOS, Antonela  and  TOLA, Florencia. ¿Ontologías como modelo, método o política?: Debates contemporáneos en antropología. Avá [online]. 2016, n.29, pp.71-98. ISSN 1851-1694.

The interest for the Self, for what exists, and for the ontological properties of the Cosmos is not a new concern in the history of Anthropology. However, only in the last two decades has the discipline undertaken an “Ontological Turn”. This perspective focuses on how different societies define the entities that inhabit the world and the relationships between them. The ontological turn is built on the critiques made to what is named as the Great Division (Nature/Culture), and to Western Naturalism as moderns’ dominant ontology. The turn is also a reaction to the linguistic turn dominating during the 1980s. In this article we present the most salient traditions in the ontological turn, the English, the French and the North American one, highlighting differences and similarities between them. We reflect on the scope and limitations of the methodological approach that this turn proposes, in order to discuss the possibilities opened by this approach in the analysis of ethnographic situations in Argentina that we work with.

Keywords : Ontological Turn; Political Ontology; Recursive Anthropology; Nature/Culture.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License