SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.26 issue1Respecting relevance in belief changeRationally choosing beliefs: some open questions author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

  • Have no cited articlesCited by SciELO

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Análisis filosófico

On-line version ISSN 1851-9636

Abstract

MARANHAO, Juliano S. A.. Why was Alchourrón afraid of snakes?. Anal. filos. [online]. 2006, vol.26, n.1, pp.62-92. ISSN 1851-9636.

In the last papers published by Alchourrón, he attacked non-monotonic logics, which he considered philosophically unsound for the representation of defeasible reasoning. Instead of a non-monotonic consequence relation, he proposed a formal representation of defeasibility based on an AGM-like revision of implicit assumptions connected to the premises. Given that this is a procedure to generate non-monotonic logics, it is not clear, from a mathematical standpoint, why he was so suspicious of such logics. In the present paper we try to answer this question based on Alchourrón' s convictions about epistemology, particularly the epistemology of law. We also propose another revision operator on theories called refinement, which provides a faithful representation of the sort of epistemic change considered by Alchourrón as intrinsic to defeasibility.

Keywords : Defeasibility; Non-monotonic logics; Belief revision; Deontic logic.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in English     · English ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License