SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.35 issue1Democracy and the Duty to Obey the LawThe Superfluity of Law Paradox and the Epistemic Value of Democracy author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

  • Have no cited articlesCited by SciELO

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Análisis filosófico

On-line version ISSN 1851-9636

Abstract

MORESO, J.J.. Nino and Dworkin on the Concepts of Law. Anal. filos. [online]. 2015, vol.35, n.1, pp.111-131. ISSN 1851-9636.

Some of the most relevant legal philosophers in the last decades, as Carlos S. Nino and Ronald Dworkin, have defended the idea that there is a plurality of concepts of law. Scott Shapiro has sustained this account in a particularly relevant way: the word ‘law’ displays a ubiquitous ambiguity, sometimes designates a set of norms and other a social organization. This is precisely the thesis which is criticized in the paper. It is argued, from a certain philosophical literature about the concepts, that concepts of social objects of intentional character (as it is the case for law, but also for literary works for example) contain a social dimension and a meaning dimension, normative in the case of the law. That is to say, the concept of law expresses a social dimension and a normative dimension intertwined.

Keywords : Carlos S. Nino; Ronald Dworkin; Concepto de derecho; Pluralismo conceptual.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License