SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.42 issue1The Justification of Logical Principles and the “Adoption Problem”WHAT THE ADOPTION PROBLEM DOES NOT SHOW author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

  • Have no cited articlesCited by SciELO

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Análisis filosófico

On-line version ISSN 1851-9636

Abstract

SANTELLI, Mauro; TORANZO CALDERON, Joaquín  and  ERENFRYD, Jonathan. ON THE ADOPTION PROBLEM AND META-LOGICAL MONISM. Anal. filos. [online]. 2022, vol.42, n.1, pp.53-78.  Epub Jan 05, 2022. ISSN 1851-9636.  http://dx.doi.org/10.36446/af.2022.407.

According to the Adoption Problem (AP) certain basic logical principles cannot be adopted. Drawing on the AP, Suki Finn presents an argument against logical pluralism: Modus Ponens (MP) and Universal Instantiation (UI) both govern a general structure shared by every logical rule. As such, analogues of these two rules must be present in every meta-logic for any logical system L, effectively imposing a restriction to logical pluralism at the meta-level through their presence constituting a “meta-logical monism”. We find a tension in the dual role that the “unadoptable rules” must play in Finn’s “meta-logical monism” rendering it ineffective to restrict logical theories and systems. Consequently, we argue they cannot be both analogues of MP and UI and inferentially productive. We conclude with a series of suggestions regarding where a more satisfying and robust interpretation of the AP could lie.

Keywords : Rule-Following; Philosophy of Logic; Philosophy of Language; Theories of Reasoning.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in English     · English ( pdf )