SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.43 issue1Where Does the Knowledge Argument Go Wrong?Algunos argumentos feministas para objetar la relación de alquiler del embarazo author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

  • Have no cited articlesCited by SciELO

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Análisis filosófico

On-line version ISSN 1851-9636

Abstract

PRADO, Jorge. La significancia de los casos idealizados de desacuerdo. Anal. filos. [online]. 2023, vol.43, n.1, pp.157-177.  Epub May 01, 2023. ISSN 1851-9636.  http://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36446/af.2023.442.

I will defend that it is necessary to defeat first-person perspective primacy arguments within the epistemology of disagreement to preserve the required epistemic equivalence for assessing appropriately dispute between pairs. The latter implies to argue why these arguments undermine the aforementioned equivalence. Secondly, I will justify the relevance of this symmetry for the epistemological analysis of disagreement. Thirdly, I will argue that maintaining the epistemic equivalence in idealized cases of disagreement does not imply a conciliationist stance since it is possible to propose a non-conformist approach without undermining symmetry by distinguishing acceptance and belief.

Keywords : Disagreement; Idealized Cases of Disagreement; Epistemic Equivalence; Acceptance; Belief.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )