SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.35 issue1El concepto de crítica de arte en la obra temprana de Walter Benjamín¿Es factible expresar la durée bergsoniana? author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

  • Have no cited articlesCited by SciELO

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Revista latinoamericana de filosofía

On-line version ISSN 1852-7353

Abstract

CASTELLI, P. Lo que Descartes le podría haber dicho a Jaegwon Kim: Causalidad y dualismo sustancial. Rev. latinoam. filos. [online]. 2009, vol.35, n.1, pp.145-162. ISSN 1852-7353.

In the present paper I consider an argument of Jaegwon Kim's, presented in the third chapter of his Physicalism or Something Near Enough, which purports to show the inadequacy of substance dualism as a solution to the problem about the nature of mind. I intend to show that Cartesian dualism is beyond the reach of Kim's attack, provided that all the implications of Descartes use of the theory of natural institution and of the notion of a psychophysical union are taken into account. Moreover, Kim's arguments directed towards the question of mind's nonspatiality, and its derived impossibility to enter into causal relations, seem to vanish, once we take into account, on the one hand, the fact that the Cartesian man involves a union of mind and body which is such that they may be regarded as co-extensive and, on the other hand, the particular way, very near to Occassionalism, in which Descartes explains interaction.

Keywords : Cartesian dualism; Causation; Ocasionalism; Mind-body union.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License