SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.46 issue2El De angelo perdito de Gilberto Crispino frente al De casu diaboli de Anselmo de Canterbury: convergencias y divergenciasLa metafísica de la creación de Duns Escoto: el entendimiento divino como locus de los posibles author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

  • Have no cited articlesCited by SciELO

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Revista latinoamericana de filosofía

On-line version ISSN 1852-7353

Abstract

FORTES, FÁBIO. Oposites dialéticas do phármakon no Fedro de Platao. Rev. latinoam. filos. [online]. 2020, vol.46, n.2, pp.48-63. ISSN 1852-7353.  http://dx.doi.org/10.36446/rlf2020169.

Taking as the starting point the ambiguity contained in the pharmakon metaphor associated with writing in Plato’s Phaedrus, in this article we intend to examine the contexts in which this word appears in this dialogue. Our goal is to understand the use of the pharmacological metaphor for the determination of writing, and how the different opposi tions that it engenders collaborate to understand the dialectical movement itself. By means of explaining these oppositions, we intend to show how the written words in Plato are permanently subject to a renversement of me- anings, and that the fruit of these disassociations and congruences is the very exemplification of dialectics itself. For this, we also consider Derrida’s (2004) reading of the passage, but we transcend it in that, when we consider the different dialectical oppositions contained in the dialogue, we do not recognise any centrality given to writing (or to orality) as an effect of the Platonic pharmakon.

Keywords : writing; pharmakon; dialectics.

        · abstract in Portuguese     · text in Portuguese