SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.13 issue2Co-opted or autonomous ? Notes to review -and reorient- studies between social movements and the State, in contemporary Argentina author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

  • Have no cited articlesCited by SciELO

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Revista SAAP

On-line version ISSN 1853-1970

Abstract

SMULOVITZ, CATALINA. Access to Justice and Public Defense in Federal Contexts: who accesses and why in the argentinian provinces ?. Revista SAAP [online]. 2019, vol.13, n.2, pp.4-13. ISSN 1853-1970.

The article compares the ways in which Argentine provinces provide free legal services and analyzes the factors that account for the differences in their provision. It claims that public defenders’ provision and access to justice are quite heterogeneous among jurisdictions, since Argentine federalism grants great legislative power to provinces to define their local legal system. The article describes the variation in the way provinces allocate public defenders and analyzes if the latter can be attributed to administrative factors, local needs, the supply of private lawyers or the levels of political competition. Empirical results reveal that the manner in which provinces allocate public defenders is not related to the population needs, but instead to administrative factors and the size of the local market of private lawyers.

Keywords : federalism; public defense; access to justice; equal rights; subnational policy.

        · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )