SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.11 issue2Productividad científica de investigadores en ciencias marinas en América LatinaBiblioteca pública e o lugar de si e do outro: lugar antropológico ou não-lugar? author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

  • Have no cited articlesCited by SciELO

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Palabra clave

On-line version ISSN 1853-9912

Abstract

CAMPOS, Fhillipe de Freitas; VILAS BOAS, Raphael Faria  and  AMARO, Bianca. A aplicação dos critérios de qualidade editorial do Catálogo 2.0 do Latindex nas revistas científicas brasileiras: uma análise preliminar. Palabra clave [online]. 2022, vol.11, n.2, e157. ISSN 1853-9912.  http://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24215/18539912e157.

Objective: The study preliminarily analyzes the application of the editorial quality criteria of Catalog 2.0 of the Latindex indexer in Brazilian scientific journals and reveals which criteria the reviewed journals least meet, serving as a parameter for editors who would like to request an evaluation of their journals over the term Catalog 2.0. Methodology: Methodology: Based on a quantitative, descriptive, and exploratory approach, the study uses the data generated during the evaluations of journals for Catalog 2.0 of Latindex to understand the editorial quality of the journals evaluated. Results: The results obtained show that the journals previously evaluated high non-compliance rates in the Latindex index, but these failures are mostly associated with non-compliance of specific criteria, which can be easily remedied, as long as the editors and editorial teams pay attention to specificities required by the indexer. Conclusions: The Brazilian scientific journals evaluated for Latindex Catalog 2.0 have high non-compliance rates and tend to fail to attend editorial criteria quality criteria that are important to guarantee the scientificity of this type of publication. Criteria such as “Continuous content generation”, “Peer review system”, “Institutional affiliation of the members of the editorial board”, “Originality requirement”, “Plagiarism detection”, “Use of interoperability protocols” are among those that have the highest non-compliance rates. On the other hand, many evaluated journals have been successful in the evaluation fulfilling these same criteria, which sets out a promising scenario in relation to the editorial quality of these journals. It's the function of the editors and editorial teams to pay attention to the fulfillment of these criteria since they are charged by practically all indexers of scientific journals.

Keywords : Editorial quality; Scientific journals; Scientific journals Indexing; Latindex-Brazil.

        · abstract in Spanish | Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )