Abstract

LOPEZ RUIZ, Osvaldo Javier. La marea métrica y su resaca: la experiencia británica en evaluación y gestión de la investigación. Palabra clave [online]. 2023, vol.12, n.2, e180. ISSN 1853-9912.  http://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24215/18539912e180.

This article reviews the British experience with the use of metrics in the evaluation and management of research, moving from an initial period of “enthusiastic” implementation to a period of cautious review and concern about the distorting effects they have had on scientific practices and their results. There is currently a concern and a need for a cultural change in the use of metrics that reverses the harmful consequences of their irresponsible use for the scientific-academic system, its institutions and individuals. Following the implementation of New Public Management, the UK was one of the first countries to establish an audit culture based on managerial criteria brought in from the private sector. What the evidence analysed in the reports of a review of independent experts convened by the British government shows is that managerial rationality ends up, in many cases, prevailing over the rationality of science itself. Members of the scientific community end up having to adapt, deviating from their objectives and, sometimes, having to take shortcuts to the good practices that the community itself has established. In response to this situation, a number of initiatives are being promoted in the UK to counteract this trend. As this situation is also found in other countries, other recent proposals to restore to the academic community and research cultures effective leadership and control over their own management are reviewed.

Keywords : Rationality; Metrics; Research evaluation; Research management; United Kingdom.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )