SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.115 issue1Importance of disparities in scientific researchEffect of the COVID-19 pandemic on non-COVID-19 patients admitted from the emergency department to the surgical ward during the strict phase of the pandemic in Buenos Aires. A cohort study author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

  • Have no cited articlesCited by SciELO

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Revista argentina de cirugía

Print version ISSN 2250-639XOn-line version ISSN 2250-639X

Rev. argent. cir. vol.115 no.1 Cap. Fed. May 2023

http://dx.doi.org/10.25132/raac.v115.n1.edgt 

Articles

“Never Event” in surgery: root-cause analysis

Gustavo Tachella1 

1 Presidente del Comité Colegio de la Asociación Argentina de Cirugía

During our daily practice all kinds of events occur, and this article highlights the importance of one of the most common problems that we have all undoubtedly faced at some point, the adverse event (AE) in the care of our patients. The authors clearly and precisely define AE as an identifiable and preventable medical error which has consequences for the patient, highlighting serious deficiencies in the safety and quality of care in a health care center. The root-cause analysis is one of the cornerstones for changing the culture towards one centered on safety and quality, replacing the “reactive” culture with a “proactive” culture, which considers events as an instrument for learning and continuous improvement1. I will focus on two aspects of this definition: IDENTIFIABLE AND PREVENTABLE.

Those institutions or surgical teams must focus on the quality of patients’ care considering their needs not only to solve their diseases but also their expectations and those of their family groups. Safety is one of the sine qua non conditions necessary for patients’ care. The authors emphasize the importance of developing a method to identify incidents or AEs and the importance of root-cause analysis as one of the tools to adopt institutional measures for patient safety. We should learn non-technical skills in order to PREVENT an adverse event. Many of the surgeons reading this editorial work in conditions far from being ideal or with many difficulties, with scarce resources and even without the support of the institutional highest hierarchical levels. Thinking of these surgeons, I recommend this article to start generating a patient safety culture, leading work teams for a thorough analysis and suggest measures to prevent these events. You will find a clear description of the rootcause analysis as a method to define institutional measures to solve them and prevent other similar events. Training surgeons considering the increasing complexity of the cases treated and the progress in technology obliges us to have a broader or crosssectional view in the development of our practice, not only focusing on the analysis the surgical procedure, but also developing the ability to analyze non-surgical factors that may jeopardize our patients’ safety. The problem of AEs is not new. We could say that according to the report of the Institute of Medicine (IOM) in 1999, “To err is Human”, between 44 000 to 98 000 patients die each year as a result of an AE, exceeding the mortality rate for traffic collisions, breast cancer and AIDS2.

Gawande et al. analyzed the errors voluntarily reported by surgeons in three hospitals in the state of Massachusetts in confidential interviews during a 5-month period. The most common causes of AE were inexperience or lack of competence (53%), communication breakdowns (43%), and fatigue or excessive workload (33%). Many causes may be present in an AE3. That is why the World Health Assembly in May 2019 adopted the resolution WHA72.6 on “Global action on patient safety” to give priority to patient safety as an essential foundational step in building, designing, operating and evaluating the performance of all health care systems. To respond to resolution WHA72.6 and move forward from global commitment to tangible action, WHO launched a flagship initiative “A Decade of Patient Safety 2021-2030”4 and defined the vision, mission and goal to achieve.

Vision

A world in which no one is harmed in health care, and every patient receives safe and respectful care, every time, everywhere.

Mission

Promote policies and actions to minimize and, if possible, eliminate all sources of risk and harm to patients during healthcare, with a patient-centered approach, based on science and through strategic partnerships.

Goal

Achieve the maximum possible reduction in avoidable harm due to unsafe health care globally. Time has come to assume that the progress of surgery, the presence of new techniques, the higher complexity to treat diseases and their multidisciplinary management incorporating different actors from other specialties or services, changes in infrastructure, and technological advances generate new challenges for which we must be prepared. Management, non-technical skills (leadership, communication, teamwork, decision making, etc.) and patient safety, are unavoidable topics for surgeons’ training.

How to get started?

▪ The only way to efficiently achieve the goal of patient satisfaction is through a broader vision, evaluating the infrastructure conditions, the expertise of the treating team, the routine use of the surgical procedure to be performed, working according to processes, implementing procedures, measuring with indicators, and analyzing and suggesting measures for improvement.

▪ Create reliable work teams in the services, with welldefined responsibilities and functions, adequate competencies, precise communication, and feedback of performance without using negative comments but rather focusing on the problem to solve it for the empowerment of the whole group.

▪ Analyze the means available to carry out the planned procedures (infrastructure, supplies, regularity, interrelated services).

▪ Establish a patient safety committee, as described in the article.

▪ Train ALL staff involved in patient care, anticipating how they interact during the procedures, which steps to follow, how to communicate, etc.

▪ Create an organizational culture that reports and records AEs, avoid a culture of punishment, foster trust among members, promote anonymous reporting and focus on solving the problem by adopting measures to prevent recurrence. The measures adopted should be thoroughly described so that they can be easily replicated.

▪ Analyze the EFFECTIVENESS of the measures adopted using indicators that objectively measure the reduction of adverse events.

▪ Insist on the concept that surgical services must perform the usual surgical procedures, thereby making it easier to normalize, analyze and draw conclusions.

▪ Patient safety is the most precious value that a healthcare institution must defend.

▪ Bear in mind that with the progress of surgery, individual efforts are not enough. Each surgical procedure is made up of multiple factors including interaction of multidisciplinary teams which often do not know each other. This means that the formation of work teams focused on treating certain conditions requires a level of communication that will be the key to patient safety.

▪ Work with EMPATHY, placing ourselves in the position of patients and looking for the best conditions for their care. If we are not used to the procedure required, refer them to institutions with experience in these diseases.

In agreement with the authors, I emphasize that regular analysis of our practice, error recognition, constructive analysis of causes, working focused on patient safety, and understanding this process as another step towards the professional growth of the team members and of the institution are the new challenges in the practice of surgery in the 21st century.

Referencias bibliográficas /References

1. Chwat C, Seisdedos M, Cingolani P, Iudica F, Lemme G. “Never Event” en Cirugía: Análisis Causa-Raíz. Rev Argent Cir 2023;115(1):52-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.25132/raac.v115.n1.1695 [ Links ]

2. Khon LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS, et al. To err is Human: Building safer health system. Washingnton DC: National Academy Press; 2003. [ Links ]

3. Gawande A, Zinner MJ, Studdert DM, Brennan TA. Analysis and error reported by surgeons at three teaching hospitals. Surgery. 2003;133:614-21. [ Links ]

4. World Health Organization. Global Patient Safety Action Plan 2021-2030. [ Links ]

Creative Commons License Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons