SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.108 issue3Three-dimensional study of internal resorptions obturated with injected gutta-percha or single guttapercha cone and bioceramic sealerEsthetics and shade in calcified teeth. Report of three clinical cases with whitening author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

  • Have no cited articlesCited by SciELO

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Revista de la Asociación Odontológica Argentina

On-line version ISSN 2683-7226

Abstract

ZMENER, Osvaldo; PAMEIJER, Cornelis H  and  DELLA PORTA, Roberto. Biological behavior of two bioceramic endodontic sealers in the bone tissue of the rat. In vivo study. Rev. Asoc. Odontol. Argent. [online]. 2020, vol.108, n.3, pp.113-118.  Epub Dec 30, 2020. ISSN 2683-7226.  http://dx.doi.org/4.

Aim:

To analyze the biocompatibility and osteogenic capacity of two silicate-based endodontic sealers, the bioceramic Bio C-Sealer (BIOc) and the MTA-based sealer MTA Densell (MTAd).

Materials and methods:

Silicone tubes filled with BIOc were implanted in the left tibias of 30 white male Wistar rats (one per tibia). In similar fashion, tubes filled with MTAd were implanted in the right tibias. The animals were eutha-nized in groups of 10 at 7,30 and 90 days postoperatively. The tibias were removed, processed for histology and analysed under optical microscopy. The observations were classified in three categories: 1: Presence of a healthy fibrous capsule and newly formed bone trabeculae without inflammatory cells. 2: Fibrous capsule with or without inflammatory cells, initial formation of bone trabeculae and presence of inflammatory cells in the surrounding tissues. 3: Absence of a fibrous capsule and/or bone formation with the presence of numerous inflammatory cells. Data was analyzed by the McNemar and the Kruskal-Wallis test (P<0.05).

Results:

At 7 days: The tissues in contact with BIOc and MTAd reacted as category 3. At 30 days: All cases were classified as category 2. At 90 days: All BIOc cases were in cat-egory 1 while MTAd presented nine cases of category 1 and one case of category 2. There were no significant differences (P>0.05) between both sealants BIOc and MTAd in each period group. However, there were significant differences (P<0.05) when the results between periods were compared.

Conclusion:

At the end of the experiment both, BIOc and MTAd behaved as biocompatible and osteogenic materials in the rats’ tibias.

Keywords : bioceramic; biocompatibility; bone tissue; endodontic sealers.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )