SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.25 número1Misfit profile of dental bridgesEffect of light-curing unit and adhesive system on marginal adaptation of class V composite restorations índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

  • No hay articulos citadosCitado por SciELO

Links relacionados

  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Acta Odontológica Latinoamericana

versión On-line ISSN 1852-4834

Resumen

PACHALY, Raquel  y  POZZOBON, Roselaine T. Analysis of surface roughness of human enamel exposed to bleaching agent and submitted to brushing. Acta odontol. latinoam. [online]. 2012, vol.25, n.1, pp.59-66. ISSN 1852-4834.

The aim of this study was to assess in vitro the surface roughness (Ra) of human enamel exposed or not exposed to the action of a bleaching agent containing 10% carbamide peroxide (CP) after brushing with different dentifrices. Ninety-six human enamel specimens were divided into 2 groups: GI - exposed to the action of 10% CP; GII - not exposed. These were subdivided into 4 brushing subgroups: (CEW) Close-Up Extra Whitening, (CUB) Colgate Ultra Branco, (CCP) Crest Cavity Protection and (DW) Deionized Water. The specimens from Group GI were exposed to 10% CP for 6 hours/14 days and those from Group GII were stored in artificial saliva for 14 days. Then they were submitted to 35.600 brushing cycles. Ra was measured before and after brushing. Ra difference was compared by two-way ANOVA. Ra was compared between subgroups using ANOVA and Tukey's test. Ra was compared between groups using T-test (á=0.05). Final and initial Ra were compared by Paired t-test; using SPSS (15.0). Two-way ANOVA difference in the outcome revealed that the use of bleaching agent did not affect the difference in Ra (p = 0.45). Brushing significantly influenced the difference in Ra (p <0.001), but the interaction between the two factors was not significant (p = 0.20). Among the brushing subgroups, a significant increase in Ra was observed for Subgroup CEW - GI: Rai 0.691 (0.112)a, Raf 0.993 (0.264)a; Raf-Rai: 0.303a(43.7%) - G2: Rai 0.794(0.167)a, Raf 1.006(0.488)a; Raf-Rai: 0.212a (26.7%) with a statistical difference for Subgroup CUB - GI: Rai 0.639 (0.163)a, Raf 0.506 (0.113)b; Raf-Rai: -0.133b(-20.8%) - GII: Rai 0.647(0.166)a, Raf 0.472b(0.260); Raf-Rai: -0.134b(-0.27%). Regardless of whether or not the enamel had been exposed to 10% CP, Ra values varied according to the abrasives in the composition of the different dentifrices.

Palabras clave : Dental enamel; Bleaching agent; Dentifrices.

        · resumen en Portugués     · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons