SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.87 número5Artroplastia total de cadera primaria con vástagos cortos en pacientes menores de 20 añosOsteosíntesis en fracturas femorales periprotésicas de cadera Vancouver tipos B1 y C. Análisis multicéntrico índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

  • No hay articulos citadosCitado por SciELO

Links relacionados

  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Revista de la Asociación Argentina de Ortopedia y Traumatología

versión On-line ISSN 1852-7434

Resumen

PAZ, María Luz et al. Prevalencia y resultados de cultivos positivos inesperados en revisiones de reemplazo total de cadera presumiblemente asépticas. Rev. Asoc. Argent. Ortop. Traumatol. [online]. 2022, vol.87, n.5, pp.645-651. ISSN 1852-7434.  http://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15417/issn.1852-7434.2022.87.5.1611.

Introduction: Periprosthetic infection rates are sometimes underestimated, given that many cases of presumed aseptic failure may be due to unrecognized infection. The objectives of this study were: (1) to estimate the prevalence of unexpected positive intraoperative cultures; (2) to determine if any of the patient’s comorbidities or risk factors were related to the presence of unexpected positive cultures; (3) to determine the implant survival during a follow-up of at least 12 months. Materials and Methods: A retrospective and observational study was carried out where, through electronic medical records, all revision total hip arthroplasties (THAs) from a single institution between 2014 and 2021 were identified. Results: Out of 49 single-stage revision THAs, 9 patients (18.4%) had an unexpected positive culture. The isolated microorganisms were Staphylococcus aureus (3), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (1), Staphylococcus lugdunensis (1), Staphylococcus epidermidis (2), Staphylococcus haemolyticus (1), Streptococcus epidermidis (1). In addition, when we evaluated the comorbidities of the patients, none had statistical significance in favoring unexpected positive cultures in aseptic revisions. We discovered that 2% of our sample with a follow-up period of 49 months developed reinfection. Conclusion: Our study showed a prevalence of unexpected positive cultures of 18.4%. None of the risk factors reported in the literature was associated with a higher risk of unexpected positive cultures, except for high ESR values. Our findings in the analyzed sample suggest that unexpected positive cultures in presumably aseptic revisions do not have significant consequences on implant survival, as found in the literature.

Palabras clave : Hip arthroplasty; hip revision surgery; microorganism; periprosthetic infections.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )