SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.31 número4El ojo: Un rompecabezas diagnóstico: Estudio observacional descriptivo y revisión índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

  • No hay articulos citadosCitado por SciELO

Links relacionados

  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Revista argentina de reumatología

versión impresa ISSN 0327-4411versión On-line ISSN 2362-3675

Resumen

SCUBLINSKY, D et al. Use and prescription of medical cannabis by rheumatologists in Argentina. Rev. argent. reumatolg. [online]. 2020, vol.31, n.4, pp.8-12. ISSN 0327-4411.

The use and prescription of cannabis and its derivatives in Rheumatology is still under discussion. The cannabis law was enacted near 3 years ago, although the regulation is just beginning. The objective of this study was to know how rheumatologists positions themselves about the use of cannabis in the framework of his medical practice. Through a survey conducted during the 2019 Argentine Congress of Rheumatology, 314 doctors answered questions about the use, recommendations and opinions regarding the indication and use of cannabinoids in their daily practice. 78.3% (246) knew of the existence of a national law. 51.6% (162) disagreed with the use of cannabinoids by their patients, while 36.6% (115) agreed, 3.2% (10) reported to strongly agree, and 8.6% (27) strongly disagreed. For patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases, 94.6% (297) reported that they never prescribed cannabinoids, 4.1% (13) prescribed them rarely, and 1.3% (4) sometimes. For degenerative rheumatic diseases, 90.4% (284) never prescribed cannabinoids, 6.7% (21) did it rarely, and 2.9% (9) did so sometimes. For fibromyalgia, 84.4% (265) never prescribed cannabinoids, 8.3% (26) prescribed them rarely, 6.4% (20) sometimes. The main obstacle to prescribing (more than one answer allowed) was not having enough scientific information (50.3%, 158), 47.5% (149) were uncertain about the cannabis preparation, 47.1% (148) had no knowledge about doses or posology, 41.4% (130) didn´t trust the producers, 38.9% (122) were no convince by the trials in the field. There were no significant differences between the variables age, gender, years in the specialty or workplace and the responses described. Conclusion: According to specialists in Argentina, the use of cannabis in rheumatology requires more scientific and pharmaceutical data to prescribe cannabinoids in a safer framework.

Palabras clave : prescription; use; cannabis; Rheumatology.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons