SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.48 número1Una hipótesis sobre la hipótesis en Hume: el papel de la intuición¿Qué puede aportar la filosofía a la comprensión de las teorías conspirativas?. Nota crítica de Conspiracy Theories de Quassim Cassam índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

  • No hay articulos citadosCitado por SciELO

Links relacionados

  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Revista latinoamericana de filosofía

versión On-line ISSN 1852-7353

Resumen

BODANZA, GUSTAVO ADRIÁN  y  LEJARRAGA, SEBASTIÁN LINARES. Rousseau’s General Will as a Bound for Strategic Self-Interested Voting. Rev. latinoam. filos. [online]. 2022, vol.48, n.1, pp.31-40. ISSN 1852-7353.  http://dx.doi.org/10.36446/rlf2022263.

Condorcet’s voting method, as its extension known as the Kemeny-Young rule, is often seen as the incarnation of Rousseau’s general will. But the Kemeny-Young rule has problems when cycles in the social ranking arise. In particular, it can lead to choose a “covered” alternative, i.e. one for which there are candidates with better performances in pairwise comparisons. On the other hand, the uncovered set, the set of all the alternatives that are not covered, puts limits to insincere votes of sophisticated voters under certain condi tions. Basically, voting insincerelly for a non-preferred alternative in order to favor the actually preferred candidate would lead to the choice of an un- covered alternative. We argue that Rousseau’s general will could be embodied in a different kind of rule tan Kemeny-Young’s, with both epistemic credentials and whose outcomes are within the uncovered set altogether. In this work we begin to explore that possibility.

Palabras clave : Rousseau; Condorcet; social choice; epistemic voting; strategic voting.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )