SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.19 número4Rehabilitación respiratoria en pacientes con enfermedad pulmonar intersticial difusa: Experiencia de un hospital especializado de ArgentinaDiagnóstico de infección tuberculosa latente: comparación de la prueba de tuberculina y el quantiferon-tb gold plus en contactos domiciliarios de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

  • No hay articulos citadosCitado por SciELO

Links relacionados

  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Revista americana de medicina respiratoria

versión On-line ISSN 1852-236X

Resumen

CAPPARELLI, Ignacio et al. Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Patients with Interstitial Lung Disease: Experience in a Specialized Hospital in Argentina. Rev. am. med. respir. [online]. 2019, vol.19, n.4, pp.298-304. ISSN 1852-236X.

Introduction: Interstitial lung diseases generate in patients exercise intolerance, dyspnea, and a decrease in health-related quality of life. Pulmonary Rehabilitation plays an important role in the treatment of these patients. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective study in a cohort of patients with interstitial lung disease (DILD) who underwent Pulmonary Rehabilitation (PR) between 2012 and 2015. Patients completed a 4-month treatment program including aerobic, core, and upper and lower limbs strength training and health education. Quality of life was measured with the St. George´s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and exercise tolerance with the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) pre- and post-PR. Results were compared among patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and other ILDs. Results: 93 patients were included (46 male); 42 (44.09%) completed the program. After the PR, the SGRQ mean score decreased by 8.7 (95% CI [confidence interval]: 2.85-14.42), with no differences between the IPF and other diagnoses. The results of the 6MWT showed mean improvement of 14.07 m, not reaching statistical significance (p = 0.132). The subgroup of patients who walked less than 400 m (n = 18) showed clinical and statistically significant improvement (40.8 m; p = 0.025). We didn’t find differences in this test in terms of diagnosis. Conclusions: PR in this cohort of patients with ILD showed improvement in quality of life and exercise tolerance, with no differences regarding the specific diagnosis.

Palabras clave : Diffuse interstitial lung disease; Pulmonary rehabilitation; Quality of life; Exercise tolerance.

        · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons