SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.23 número4Demoras y adherencia al tratamiento de las apneas del sueño dentro de un sistema de provisión universal en un hospital públicoOsificación heterotópica en COVID-19, ¿la asociación aún no documentada? Reporte de dos casos índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

  • No hay articulos citadosCitado por SciELO

Links relacionados

  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Revista americana de medicina respiratoria

versión On-line ISSN 1852-236X

Resumen

CAFARO, Mario A; BENAVIDEZ, Rodrigo A; YARYURA MONTERO, José G  y  NAVARRO, Ricardo. COVID-19-Related Post-Intubation Tracheal Stenosis. Prospective Study of its Surgical Treatment. Rev. am. med. respir. [online]. 2023, vol.23, n.4, pp.317-326. ISSN 1852-236X.  http://dx.doi.org/10.56538/ramr.yzbd4253.

Introduction:

The disease caused by SARS-CoV-2 has become a significant public health issue. 5 % of the patients required endotracheal intubation due to acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, leading to an increased number of consultations for tracheal stenosis. This work was done with the aim of presenting the results of tracheal resection in patients with post-COVID-19 stenosis.

Material and methods:

Analytical, prospective, observational study. 11 patients were included. The preoperative and postoperative evaluation was the same for all patients. Post-surgical ventilation and phonation were assessed up to 30 days. The Clavien and Dindo classification was used to grade post-surgical complications, with follow-up extended up to 60 post-surgical days. Statistical analysis: the Wilcoxon test was used to compare the results.

Results:

27.2 % of the patients had postoperative complications. The comparison of pre- and postoperative ventilation (p < 0.05) was statistically significant, with improvement in the postoperative period. When comparing pre- and postoperative fiberoptic bronchoscopy (tracheal lumen diameter), the result was also statistically significant (p < 0.05).

Conclusion:

The results obtained are similar to those expressed in the literature. Tracheal resection is a safe and effective procedure and should be considered as first-line treatment for tracheal stenosis.

Palabras clave : Coronavirus; Tracheal stenosis; Intubation; Intratracheal; Thoracic surgery.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )