SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 número33Convertibilidade, performatividade política e protesto agrário. Dos consensos iniciais e seus limites nas pampas de Córdoba (1991-2002)Riscos Psicossociais na Profissao Académica: Uma Análise Interpretativa do Discurso de Professores Universitários Argentinos índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

  • Não possue artigos citadosCitado por SciELO

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Trabajo y sociedad

versão On-line ISSN 1514-6871

Resumo

SARTELLI, Eduardo  e  GRIMALDI, Nicolás. After the conflict. The parliamentary actions of the Argentinian agrarian bourgeoisie (2009-2014). Trab. soc. [online]. 2019, n.33, pp.141-160. ISSN 1514-6871.

In the following paper, we will undertake a detailed study of the parliamentary actions of the agrarian corporations over the 2009-2014 period. The aim is to study the actual existence of the so- called “Group A”. That is, a consolidated parliamentary bloc, tied to agrarian interests and capable of dragging certain parties an impose its will. For that purpose, we have, first and foremost, undertaken a brief review on the project processing linked to the agrarian sector before the 2008 conflict. Secondly, we will seek to reconstruct which has been the preparation of the agrarian entities for the elections in June 2009 and the political actions of the deputies linked to the agrarian sector. For the latter, we will analyze the economic projects introduced by the deputies from the agrarian sector in the Commission of Agriculture, Livestock, and Fisheries of the National Chamber of Deputies, as well as the projects introduced by the different political parties and its final destination. Finally, we will track the main discussions and questions between the agrarian entities during the analyzed period. Looking at the documents, the evidence shows the absence of a bloc called “Group A”, it also shows that the parties have introduced various projects, not always linked to a business interest in a specific layer of the agrarian bourgeoisie, and lastly, that that heterogeneous political actions did not achieve the approval of any project.

Palavras-chave : Agrarian bourgeoisie; Parliament; Business corporations; State.

        · resumo em Português | Espanhol     · texto em Espanhol