SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.89 número5Angioplastia de tronco de la coronaria izquierda no protegido: evolución clínica al año y a los 3 años. Predictores de eventosDeterminantes de la fracción de eyección ventricular izquierda en pacientes con estenosis aórtica grave índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

  • Não possue artigos citadosCitado por SciELO

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Revista argentina de cardiología

versão On-line ISSN 1850-3748

Resumo

GAMBARTE, MARIA JIMENA et al. Prognostic Comparison between Risk Scores and Neural Networks to Predict Short- and Mid-Term Mortality in Acute Heart Failure. Rev. argent. cardiol. [online]. 2021, vol.89, n.5, pp.435-446.  Epub 01-Out-2021. ISSN 1850-3748.

Background:

Heart failure (HF) risk scores to assess all-cause mortality during the first year have areas under the ROC curve (AUC) ranging between 0.59 and 0.80

Objective:

To develop and validate a neural network (NN) algorithm-based model to improve traditional scores’ performance for predicting short- and mid-term mortality of patients with acute HF.

Methods:

A prospective clinical database was analyzed including 483 patients admitted with diagnosis of acute HF in a coronary care unit community hospital of Buenos Aires, between June 2005 and June 2019. Among 181 demographic, laboratory, treatment and follow-up variables, only 25 were selected to calculate five acute heart failure risk scores aimed to predict 30-day, 6-month and 1-year mortality: EFFECT, ADHERE, GWTG-HF, 3C-HF, and ACUTE-HF.

Results:

Mean age was 78 ± 11.1 years, 58% were men, 35% had ischemic necrotic HF and median left ventricular ejection fraction was 52% (35-60). At 30 days, the EFFECT score (AUC:0.68) and the 3C-HF score (AUC: 0.68) showed better performance than the ACUTE-HF score (AUC: 0.54). At 6-month and 1-year follow-up, the EFFECT score (ROC: 0.69 and 0.69) outperformed the ADHERE score (AUC: 0.53 and 0.56), and EFFECT (AUC: 0.69 and 0.69), GWRG-HF (AUC = 0.68 and 0.66), and 3C-HF (AUC:0.67 and 0.67) scores outperformed the ACUTE-HF score (AUC:0.53 and 0.56). The best results with NN algorithms were obtained with a two-hidden layer multilayer perceptron. A 24-9-7-2-layer architecture NN was used with the following results: AUC: 0.82, negative predictive value (NPV) 93.2% and positive predictive value (PPV) 66.7% for 30-day mortality; AUC: 0.87, NPV: 89.1% and PPV: 78,6% for 6-month mortality; and AUC: 0.85, NPV: 85.6% and PPV: 78.9% for 1-year mortality. In terms of discrimination, NN algorithms outperformed all the traditional scores (p <0.001). For this algorithm, the most influential factors in descending order that scored ≥50% normalized importance to predict 30-day mortality were serum creatinine, hemoglobin, respiratory rate, blood urea nitrogen, serum sodium, age and systolic blood pressure. Also, NYHA functional class III-IV and dementia added prognostic capacity to 6-month mortality, and heart rate and chronic kidney disease to 1-year mortality.

Conclusions:

The models with NN algorithms were significantly superior to traditional risk scores in our population of patients with HF. These findings constitute a working hypothesis to be validated with a larger and multicenter sample of cases.

Palavras-chave : Heart failure; Prognosis; Mortality; Risk score; Deep learning; Artificial intelligence.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Espanhol     · Espanhol ( pdf )