SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.90 número5Equidad laboral, violencia de género y factores de riesgo cardiovascular en especialistas en cardiología argentinosSeguimiento de graduados de la Carrera de Médico Especialista en cardiología de la Universidad de Buenos Aires. Experiencia del Hospital Cosme Argerich índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

  • Não possue artigos citadosCitado por SciELO

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Revista argentina de cardiología

versão On-line ISSN 1850-3748

Resumo

HABER, DIEGO M. LOWENSTEIN et al. Contractile Reserve by Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Alone, o Considering Elastance. ¿Which is the Best Predictor of Events After a Stress Echo Without Ischemia?. Rev. argent. cardiol. [online]. 2022, vol.90, n.5, pp.346-352.  Epub 04-Set-2022. ISSN 1850-3748.  http://dx.doi.org/10.7775/rac.es.v90.i5.20560.

Background:

The behavior of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) during exercise is used to measure contractile reserve (CR). CR measured by elastance could have greater prognostic value.

Objective:

To establish whether the measurement of CR by elastance adds long-term prognostic value to CR measured by LVEF in patients with a Stress Echo without myocardial ischemia.

Material and methods:

Retrospective study, carried out in 904 patients with an exercise Stress Echo without ischemia. CR was assessed by LVEF and by elastance. Patients were divided into 2 groups: Group 1: presence of CR by LVEF (in turn this group was divided into 2 subgroups: Group 1A, CR with elastance present, and Group 1B: absence of CR by elastance), and Group 2: patients with absence of CR by LVEF. The follow-up was 17,7 ± 5,4 months. Outcomes considered were death, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), stroke, and cardiovascular hospitalization.

Results:

536 patients were included in Group 1, 200 (37,3 %) in Group 1A and 336 (62,7%) in Group 1B. In Group 2, 368 patients were included. At follow-up, patients in Group 2 had more events, 30 (8.1%) vs. 22 (2.6%) (HR 3.14, 95% CI 1.95-5.9, log rank test p <0.001). Within G1, patients in Group 1B presented more events: 18(5.3%) vs 4 (2%) (HR 2.46 CI 95% 1.06-7.3, log rank test p <0.05). In the regression model, CR assessed by LVEF and additionally by elastance was the only significant outcome predictor (HR 3.2, 95% CI 1.83-5.6, p <0.001).

Conclusions:

In an exercise Stress Echo negative for ischemia, CR behavior evaluated by elastance allowed us to identify a subgroup with a worse long-term prognosis in patients with normal LVEF response.

Palavras-chave : Echocardiography, Stress; Myocardial Contraction; Ventricular Function, Left / physiology.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Espanhol     · Espanhol ( pdf )