Resumo

CASTELLINI, Jorge et al. Grillas para evaluar trabajos científicos: Un modo de objetivar procesos de evaluación. Rev. Asoc. Argent. Ortop. Traumatol. [online]. 2019, vol.84, n.1, pp.75-79. ISSN 1852-7434.

For validity and credibility purposes, the presentation of scientific publications in a report form requires a certain layout that we could call the "anatomy of the report", as well as the dynamics of it, considered the "physiology of the report". But how are conference scientific publications evaluated? What are the criteria used determine whether a report is accepted or not? The Research Committee at the AAOT developed evaluation with the aim of publishing them to have an objective tool for the qualitative and quantitative evaluation of all types of publications submitted. These grids could be used by evaluators to present their feedback, as well as an objective evaluation tool. Authors could used them as a guide to prepare the report of their research work.

Palavras-chave : Grids; Scientific paper; Orthopedics; Traumatology.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Espanhol     · Espanhol ( pdf )