SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.108 número3Estudio tridimensional de reabsorciones internas obturadas con gutapercha inyectable o cono único de gutapercha más sellador biocerámicoEstética y color en dientes calcificados. Informe de tres casos clínicos con blanqueamiento índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

  • Não possue artigos citadosCitado por SciELO

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Revista de la Asociación Odontológica Argentina

versão On-line ISSN 2683-7226

Resumo

ZMENER, Osvaldo; PAMEIJER, Cornelis H  e  DELLA PORTA, Roberto. Biological behavior of two bioceramic endodontic sealers in the bone tissue of the rat. In vivo study. Rev. Asoc. Odontol. Argent. [online]. 2020, vol.108, n.3, pp.113-118.  Epub 30-Dez-2020. ISSN 2683-7226.  http://dx.doi.org/4.

Aim:

To analyze the biocompatibility and osteogenic capacity of two silicate-based endodontic sealers, the bioceramic Bio C-Sealer (BIOc) and the MTA-based sealer MTA Densell (MTAd).

Materials and methods:

Silicone tubes filled with BIOc were implanted in the left tibias of 30 white male Wistar rats (one per tibia). In similar fashion, tubes filled with MTAd were implanted in the right tibias. The animals were eutha-nized in groups of 10 at 7,30 and 90 days postoperatively. The tibias were removed, processed for histology and analysed under optical microscopy. The observations were classified in three categories: 1: Presence of a healthy fibrous capsule and newly formed bone trabeculae without inflammatory cells. 2: Fibrous capsule with or without inflammatory cells, initial formation of bone trabeculae and presence of inflammatory cells in the surrounding tissues. 3: Absence of a fibrous capsule and/or bone formation with the presence of numerous inflammatory cells. Data was analyzed by the McNemar and the Kruskal-Wallis test (P<0.05).

Results:

At 7 days: The tissues in contact with BIOc and MTAd reacted as category 3. At 30 days: All cases were classified as category 2. At 90 days: All BIOc cases were in cat-egory 1 while MTAd presented nine cases of category 1 and one case of category 2. There were no significant differences (P>0.05) between both sealants BIOc and MTAd in each period group. However, there were significant differences (P<0.05) when the results between periods were compared.

Conclusion:

At the end of the experiment both, BIOc and MTAd behaved as biocompatible and osteogenic materials in the rats’ tibias.

Palavras-chave : bioceramic; biocompatibility; bone tissue; endodontic sealers.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Espanhol     · Espanhol ( pdf )