Contact electrical burns are more severe than other forms of burns and the most frequent are low voltage (less than 1000V) injuries, especially in pediatric population1,2. In Argentina, a total of 16% of electrical burns were reported between the pediatric burns treated at Hospital de Quema dos of Buenos Aires, Argentina (a major burns reference center) in the period from 2014 to 2018. Most of them were on hands and due to domestic accidents (data provided of statistical division of that hospital).
The upper extremities are involved in most electrical injuries because they are typically the contact points to the voltage source3. Moreover, treatment of hand burns is an important therapeutic challenge and amputation rates for upper extremity electrical injuries are typically reported between 35% and 40%3.
The therapeutic approach to electrical burns, as well as thermal burns, consists of different tools and requires systemic management1,4. Skin grafting is often necessary and surgical procedures like escharotomy, fasciotomy, grafts and flaps are more effective with adjuvant thera pies (like platelet rich plasma and hyperbaric oxygen therapy)5,6. Although therapeutic algorithms are useful, there is no recommendation of individual surgical pro cedures. Inappropriate initial treatment or delay of initial treatment may exert adverse effects on the subsequent treatment and course. Adequate surgical approach and early rehabilitation, wound coverage, and delayed de formity reconstruction are important concepts in treating electrical injuries3.
Here, we describe a case of a low voltage electrical burn on a hand and the therapeutic approach with platelet rich plasma, grafts and hyperbaric oxygenation.
Clinical case
A 17-year-old female patient was admitted to our hospital in Jan 2019 because of a low- voltage household electric injury with five days of evolution. She had history of alcoholism and peripheral facial paralysis 3 years ago, with restitution without sequelae. She suffered electric shock burns by touching the plug metal, compromising distal area of I to III fingers. Burn of 0.1% of total body surface area (TBSA), type B and severity group I was diagnosed (Fig. 1A). The patient was lucid, oriented in time and space and with good diuresis and received analgesia with a good response in the duration of her hospitalization. After cures with collagenase and petro leum gauze dressing during two days, she was treated with three daily enzymatic debridement with papain and carbopol prepared in hospital and an immediate session of hyperbaric oxygen therapy at 1.45 ATA ≈100% O2 (Revitalair 430). By the fifth day of admission in the hospital, the patient had received three enzymatic debridements and three hyperbaric chamber sessions (one before each debridement), and then, she received two days of cures with silver sulfadiazine and lidocaine topical in occlusive petroleum gauze dressing and film was performed.
On the seventh day, the patient received autologous platelet rich plasma prepared by the hemotherapist and a session of hyperbaric chamber. The lesions were occluded for 3 days, until 16/1 inclusive (Fig. 1B).
Three days after the platelet rich plasma, she received a session of hyperbaric chamber and heterograft of porcine der mis and the wounds were occluded for 4 days with petroleum gauze dressing to reduce maceration (Fig. 1C).
Fourteen days after admission, a partial autologous skin flap and a new session of platelet rich plasma and hyperbaric session were performed (Fig. 1D) and after seven days of cures and control, the patient was discharged (Fig. 1E).
During hospitalization, serological diagnosis of VDRL (+) 1/64 dilution titer was confirmed by interconsultation with an infectologist. She received antibiotic treatment and completed serological studies with authorization from the patient and her mother.
Lack of follow-up due to patient inconstancy was reported, but a control visit, performed repeatedly by social worker, after two months of discharge, good evolution and acceptable aesthetic results were reported (Fig. 1F). Dediles pressotherapy and hydra tion were indicated for complete rehabilitation with support from the kinesiologist in charge.
Discussion
Despite of its low frequency, electrical burns are considered complex wounds but there are no specific guidelines for their treatment1,4,7.
Therapeutic approach for complex burns might be ade quate for treating low voltage electrical injuries on hands because a good rehabilitation and functional restoration is necessary4,7.
Fisher et al reported that enzymatic early debridement in deep burns of the distal upper extremity prevents opera tive escharotomy and compartment syndrome8. In the case reported here, the enzymatic debridement was performed with collagenase and papain at different times of healing.
Among the therapeutic interventions, the application of platelet rich plasma (PRP) is one of the most widely used strategies as a simple and cheap way for promoting tissue regeneration using autologous growth factors. It was de monstrated that PRP prevents healing delay and structural alterations in different models of wounds, including burns5.
Moreover, many factors can impair wound healing, but a crucial factor is tissue hypoxia. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy is indicated in burns to accelerate healing, prevent sepsis and for improving the graft and flap survival6, 9. To sum up, the hyperbaric oxygenation of the tissues contributes to restore the perfusion of viable tissues and repair damaged nervous tissue, contributing to decrease limb necrosis as it was described in two case of electrical burn10,11. In a previous report, hyperbaric oxygen therapy was used to improve the effectiveness of debridement and conditioning of the skin grafts10.
A previous case report was done by some of us. It was used hyperbaric oxygen therapy to improve oxygenation in a two-years- old- girl with a low-voltage electric burn. In this case, it was done an autologous flap and the amputa tion was limited to the first phalanx of the hand, using that therapeutic scheme11.
Soft injuries are devastating and surgically demanding and autologous skin grafts and flap coverage were com mon strategies of wound management in electrical burns1. The patient presented here required two types of grafts for a complete coverage which improved healing and ensured a good rehabilitation. The reconstruction phase which focuses on restoring sensory and motor function, can last several years1,2.
In this case, the patient was discharged after 21 days after admission with excellent results in rehabilitation after a multi-therapeutic approach of an electrical burn. A posterior control after two months revealed good evolu tion and satisfactory functional and sensory rehabilitation.
This is a report of a therapeutic approach to a low-voltage-electrical burn. There are required more studies to define and propose the treatment, considering accessibility to different therapeutic tools in each institution. Because of its low frequency, it would be optimal to have more observational studies and case reports. Additional reports of low-voltage electrical injury cases should be made to lay the groundwork for a future consensus in the treatment of different kinds of electrical burns.
Consent for publication was obtained from the patient